» Articles » PMID: 26014150

Risk Factors for Positive Deep Pelvic Nodal Involvement in Patients with Palpable Groin Melanoma Metastases: Can the Extent of Surgery Be Safely Minimized? : A Retrospective, Multicenter Cohort Study

Overview
Journal Ann Surg Oncol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2015 May 28
PMID 26014150
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Patients with palpable melanoma groin metastases have a poor prognosis. There is debate whether a combined superficial and deep groin dissection (CGD) is necessary or if superficial groin dissection (SGD) alone is sufficient.

Aim: The aim of this study was to analyze risk factors for deep pelvic nodal involvement in a retrospective, multicenter cohort of palpable groin melanoma metastases. This could aid in the development of an algorithm for selective surgery in the future.

Methods: This study related to 209 therapeutic CGDs from four tertiary centers in The Netherlands (1992-2013), selected based on complete preoperative imaging and pathology reports. Analyzed risk factors included baseline and primary tumor characteristics, total and positive number of inguinal nodes, inguinal lymph node ratio (LNR) and positive deep pelvic nodes on imaging (computed tomography [CT] ± positron emission tomography [PET], or PET - low-dose CT).

Results: Median age was 57 years, 54 % of patients were female, and median follow-up was 21 months (interquartile range [IQR] 11-46 months). Median Breslow thickness was 2.10 mm (IQR 1.40-3.40 mm), and 26 % of all primary melanomas were ulcerated. Positive deep pelvic nodes occurred in 35 % of CGDs. Significantly fewer inguinal nodes were positive in case of negative deep pelvic nodes (median 1 [IQR 1-2] vs. 3 [IQR 1-4] for positive deep pelvic nodes; p < 0.001), and LNR was significantly lower for negative versus positive deep pelvic nodes [median 0.15 (IQR 0.10-0.25) vs. 0.33 (IQR 0.14-0.54); p < 0.001]. A combination of negative imaging, low LNR, low number of positive inguinal nodes, and no extracapsular extension (ECE) could accurately predict the absence of pelvic nodal involvement in 84 % of patients.

Conclusions: Patients with negative imaging, few positive inguinal nodes, no ECE, and low LNR have a low risk of positive deep pelvic nodes and may safely undergo SGD alone.

Citing Articles

Extent of Groin Dissection in Melanoma: A Mixed-Methods, Population-Based Study of Practice Patterns and Outcomes.

Kupper S, Austin J, Dingley B, Xu Y, Kong K, Brar M Curr Oncol. 2021; 28(6):5422-5433.

PMID: 34940091 PMC: 8700358. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28060452.


Surgery for Metastatic Melanoma: an Evolving Concept.

Testori A, Blankenstein S, van Akkooi A Curr Oncol Rep. 2019; 21(11):98.

PMID: 31696407 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-019-0847-6.


Robotic-Assisted Pelvic Lymphadenectomy for Metastatic Melanoma Results in Durable Oncologic Outcomes.

Miura J, Dossett L, Thapa R, Kim Y, Potdar A, Daou H Ann Surg Oncol. 2019; 27(1):196-202.

PMID: 30949862 PMC: 7771311. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07333-8.


Optimal extent of completion lymphadenectomy for patients with melanoma and a positive sentinel node in the groin.

Verver D, Madu M, Oude Ophuis C, Faut M, de Wilt J, Bonenkamp J Br J Surg. 2017; 105(1):96-105.

PMID: 29095479 PMC: 5765473. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10644.

References
1.
Balch C, Gershenwald J, Soong S, Thompson J, Atkins M, Byrd D . Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27(36):6199-206. PMC: 2793035. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.4799. View

2.
Badgwell B, Xing Y, Gershenwald J, Lee J, Mansfield P, Ross M . Pelvic lymph node dissection is beneficial in subsets of patients with node-positive melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007; 14(10):2867-75. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-007-9512-7. View

3.
van der Ploeg A, van Akkooi A, Schmitz P, van Geel A, de Wilt J, Eggermont A . Therapeutic surgical management of palpable melanoma groin metastases: superficial or combined superficial and deep groin lymph node dissection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011; 18(12):3300-8. PMC: 3192282. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-011-1741-0. View

4.
Kruijff S, Hoekstra H . The current status of S-100B as a biomarker in melanoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012; 38(4):281-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.12.005. View

5.
Rbah-Vidal L, Vidal A, Besse S, Cachin F, Bonnet M, Audin L . Early detection and longitudinal monitoring of experimental primary and disseminated melanoma using [¹⁰F]ICF01006, a highly promising melanoma PET tracer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012; 39(9):1449-61. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-012-2168-y. View