» Articles » PMID: 26011567

Some See It, Some Don't: Exploring the Relation Between Inattentional Blindness and Personality Factors

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2015 May 27
PMID 26011567
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Human awareness is highly limited, which is vividly demonstrated by the phenomenon that unexpected objects go unnoticed when attention is focused elsewhere (inattentional blindness). Typically, some people fail to notice unexpected objects while others detect them instantaneously. Whether this pattern reflects stable individual differences is unclear to date. In particular, hardly anything is known about the influence of personality on the likelihood of inattentional blindness. To fill this empirical gap, we examined the role of multiple personality factors, namely the Big Five, BIS/BAS, absorption, achievement motivation, and schizotypy, in these failures of awareness. In a large-scale sample (N = 554), susceptibility to inattentional blindness was associated with a low level of openness to experience and marginally with a low level of achievement motivation. However, in a multiple regression analysis, only openness emerged as an independent, negative predictor. This suggests that the general tendency to be open to experience extends to the domain of perception. Our results complement earlier work on the possible link between inattentional blindness and personality by demonstrating, for the first time, that failures to consciously perceive unexpected objects reflect individual differences on a fundamental dimension of personality.

Citing Articles

Stimulus awareness is associated with secondary somatosensory cortex activation in an inattentional numbness paradigm.

Peters A, Bruchmann M, Dellert T, Moeck R, Schlossmacher I, Straube T Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):22575.

PMID: 38114726 PMC: 10730535. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-49857-w.


Examining Responsible Gambling Program Awareness and Engagement Trends and Relationships with Gambling Beliefs and Behaviors: A Three-Wave Study of Customers from a Major Gambling Operator.

Louderback E, LaPlante D, Abarbanel B, Kraus S, Bernhard B, Gray H J Gambl Stud. 2022; 39(1):401-429.

PMID: 35301605 PMC: 8930286. DOI: 10.1007/s10899-022-10109-7.


Susceptibility to phishing on social network sites: A personality information processing model.

Frauenstein E, Flowerday S Comput Secur. 2020; 94:101862.

PMID: 32501314 PMC: 7252086. DOI: 10.1016/j.cose.2020.101862.


Sustained Inattentional Blindness Does Not Always Decrease With Age.

Zhang H, Yan C, Zhang X, Fang J Front Psychol. 2018; 9:1390.

PMID: 30210377 PMC: 6124514. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01390.


Attention capture, processing speed, and inattentional blindness.

Wright T, Roque N, Boot W, Stothart C Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018; 190:72-77.

PMID: 30016757 PMC: 6309252. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.07.005.

References
1.
Calvillo D, Jackson R . Animacy, perceptual load, and inattentional blindness. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013; 21(3):670-5. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0543-8. View

2.
Most S, Simons D, Scholl B, Jimenez R, Clifford E, Chabris C . How not to be seen: the contribution of similarity and selective ignoring to sustained inattentional blindness. Psychol Sci. 2001; 12(1):9-17. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00303. View

3.
Drew T, Vo M, Wolfe J . The invisible gorilla strikes again: sustained inattentional blindness in expert observers. Psychol Sci. 2013; 24(9):1848-53. PMC: 3964612. DOI: 10.1177/0956797613479386. View

4.
Seegmiller J, Watson J, Strayer D . Individual differences in susceptibility to inattentional blindness. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011; 37(3):785-91. DOI: 10.1037/a0022474. View

5.
McCrae R, Costa Jr P . Personality trait structure as a human universal. Am Psychol. 1997; 52(5):509-16. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.52.5.509. View