» Articles » PMID: 26007310

Accuracy of Estimated Blood Loss in Predicting Need for Transfusion After Delivery

Overview
Journal Am J Perinatol
Date 2015 May 27
PMID 26007310
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The definition of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) was developed more than 50 years ago. Since then, the obstetric population has changed dramatically. We sought to determine how well we estimated blood loss (EBL) and find thresholds predicting need for transfusion.

Study Design: We performed a prospective cohort study from 2010 to 2012, comparing those who needed transfusion postpartum and those who did not. EBL, calculated EBL (cEBL), and change in hematocrit were calculated for patients who did not receive transfusion, and EBL was calculated for those who did receive transfusion, stratified by delivery type. Receiver operator curves were created and optimal thresholds of EBL to predict transfusion were estimated.

Results: Among 4,804 patients, transfusion was required for 0.65% of vaginal and 8.7% of cesarean deliveries. Median EBL was higher in women requiring transfusion. A weak correlation was noted between EBL and cEBL for all deliveries. Thresholds of 500 mL blood loss for vaginal delivery and 1,000 mL for cesarean had the best predictive ability for transfusion.

Conclusion: In this modern obstetric, cohort EBL is weakly correlated with cEBL, suggesting that accuracy of clinical estimates of blood loss is modest. However, EBL predicts need for transfusion, with optimal thresholds of 500 mL for a vaginal delivery and 1,000 mL in a cesarean. This validates the traditional definitions of PPH in our modern population.

Citing Articles

Do Patients with Borderline Anemia Need Treatment before Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.

Cai L, Chen L, Zhao C, Han G, Wang Q, Kang P Orthop Surg. 2023; 16(1):123-131.

PMID: 38049380 PMC: 10782264. DOI: 10.1111/os.13955.


The AccuFlow sensor: a novel digital health tool to assess intrapartum blood loss at cesarean delivery.

Lord M, Gould A, Clark M, Rouse D, Lewkowitz A J Perinat Med. 2023; 51(8):997-1005.

PMID: 37155696 PMC: 11170087. DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2023-0101.


Prevalence and Associated Factors for Post-Caesarean Delivery Blood Transfusion in Eastern Sudan: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Mandar O, Hassan B, Abdelbagi O, Eltayeb R, ALhabardi N, Adam I J Blood Med. 2022; 13:219-227.

PMID: 35585876 PMC: 9109909. DOI: 10.2147/JBM.S355846.


The Experience of Organizing Blood Donation Camp through Student Initiative.

Sharma A, Harish J, Kumar D, Thaman R J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2022; 13(Suppl 2):S1488-S1495.

PMID: 35018016 PMC: 8687008. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_264_21.


A comprehensive digital phenotype for postpartum hemorrhage.

Zheutlin A, Vieira L, Shewcraft R, Li S, Wang Z, Schadt E J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021; 29(2):321-328.

PMID: 34559880 PMC: 8757293. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocab181.


References
1.
Sebire N, Jolly M, Harris J, Wadsworth J, Joffe M, BEARD R . Maternal obesity and pregnancy outcome: a study of 287,213 pregnancies in London. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001; 25(8):1175-82. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801670. View

2.
Brant H . Precise estimation of postpartum haemorrhage: difficulties and importance. Br Med J. 1967; 1(5537):398-400. PMC: 1841591. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.1.5537.398. View

3.
McNulty S, Torjman M, Grodecki W, Marr A, Schieren H . A comparison of four bedside methods of hemoglobin assessment during cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 1995; 81(6):1197-202. DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199512000-00014. View

4.
Newton M, Mosey L, EGLI G, GIFFORD W, HULL C . Blood loss during and immediately after delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1961; 17:9-18. View

5.
GAHRES E, ALBERT S, DODEK S . Intrapartum blood loss measured with Cr 51-tagged erythrocytes. Obstet Gynecol. 1962; 19:455-62. View