Improved Assay Performance of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Array over Conventional Karyotyping in Analyzing Products of Conception
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Conventional karyotyping has been a routine method to identify chromosome abnormalities in products of conception. However, this process is being transformed by single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array, which has advantages over karyotyping, including higher resolution and dispensing with cell culture. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the advantage of high-resolution SNP array in identifying genetic aberrations in products of conception.
Methods: We consecutively collected 155 products of conception specimens, including 139 from first-trimester miscarriage and 16 from second-trimester miscarriage. SNP array was performed on these samples in parallel with G-banded karyotyping.
Results: The test success rate was 98.1% (152/155) using SNP array, which was higher than that using karyotyping (133/155, 85.8%). It yielded a 63.8% (97/152) abnormality rate, and the frequency of various chromosome abnormalities was in agreement with other previous studies. The results between array and karyotyping demonstrated a 94.0% (125/133) concordance. SNP array obtained additional aberrations in 3.8% (5/133) of those cases unidentified by karyotyping, which included three cases with whole-genome uniparental disomy, one with pathogenic copy number variation, and one with del(4)(q35.1q35.2) and dup(12)(q24.31q24.33). However, chromosome translocations presented in two cases and tetraploidy presented in one case were detected by karyotyping instead of array. Additionally, two out of three cases with mosaic trisomy were revealed by array but recognized as pure trisomy by karyotyping.
Conclusion: This study demonstrated that SNP array had certain advantages over G-banded karyotyping, including a higher success rate, additional detection of copy number variations and uniparental disomy, and improved sensitivity to mosaicism. Therefore, it would be an alternative method to karyotyping in clinical genetic practice.
Chromosomal Abnormalities in Early Pregnancy Losses: A Study of 900 Samples.
Bozhinovski G, Terzikj M, Kubelka-Sabit K, Jasar D, Lazarevski S, Livrinova V Balkan J Med Genet. 2024; 26(2):11-20.
PMID: 38482257 PMC: 10932600. DOI: 10.2478/bjmg-2023-0014.
Cai M, Lin N, Xu L, Huang H J Cell Mol Med. 2021; 25(12):5721-5728.
PMID: 33973351 PMC: 8184667. DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.16588.
Zhou J, Yang Z, Sun J, Liu L, Zhou X, Liu F Genes (Basel). 2021; 12(3).
PMID: 33800913 PMC: 7999180. DOI: 10.3390/genes12030376.
Genome Sequencing Explores Complexity of Chromosomal Abnormalities in Recurrent Miscarriage.
Dong Z, Yan J, Xu F, Yuan J, Jiang H, Wang H Am J Hum Genet. 2019; 105(6):1102-1111.
PMID: 31679651 PMC: 6904795. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.10.003.
Prenatal Diagnosis of Fetuses With Increased Nuchal Translucency by Genome Sequencing Analysis.
Choy K, Wang H, Shi M, Chen J, Yang Z, Zhang R Front Genet. 2019; 10:761.
PMID: 31475041 PMC: 6706460. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00761.