Barriers to Childhood Immunisation: Findings from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children
Overview
Affiliations
Objectives: To examine barriers to childhood immunisation experienced by parents in Australia.
Design: Cross-sectional analysis of secondary data.
Setting: Nationally representative Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC).
Participants: Five thousand one hundred seven infants aged 3-19 months in 2004.
Main Outcome Measure: Maternal report of immunisation status: incompletely or fully immunised.
Results: Overall, 9.3% (473) of infants were incompletely immunised; of these just 16% had mothers who disagreed with immunisation. Remaining analyses focussed on infants whose mother did not disagree with immunisation (N=4994) (of whom 8% [398] were incompletely immunised). Fifteen variables representing potential immunisation barriers and facilitators were available in LSAC; these were entered into a latent class model to identify distinct clusters (or 'classes') of barriers experienced by families. Five classes were identified: (1) 'minimal barriers', (2) 'lone parent, mobile families with good support', (3) 'low social contact and service information; psychological distress', (4) 'larger families, not using formal childcare', (5) 'child health issues/concerns'. Compared to infants from families experiencing minimal barriers, all other barrier classes had a higher risk of incomplete immunisation. For example, the adjusted risk ratio (RR) for incomplete immunisation was 1.51 (95% confidence interval: 1.08-2.10) among those characterised by 'low social contact and service information; psychological distress', and 2.47 (1.87-3.25) among 'larger families, not using formal childcare'.
Conclusions: Using the most recent data available for examining these issues in Australia, we found that the majority of incompletely immunised infants (in 2004) did not have a mother who disagreed with immunisation. Barriers to immunisation are heterogeneous, suggesting a need for tailored interventions.
Socioeconomic Differences in Vaccination Coverage After a Mandatory Vaccination Law, 1855-1900.
Ukonaho S, Lummaa V, Briga M JAMA Netw Open. 2025; 8(2):e2460558.
PMID: 39969881 PMC: 11840648. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.60558.
Comparison of Physicians' Attitudes and Practice Regarding Vaccination during Pregnancy in Turkey.
Kara A, Tezer H, Ciftci E, Ates I Vaccines (Basel). 2024; 12(7).
PMID: 39066436 PMC: 11281721. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12070798.
Sigdel B, Jin Y, Dhakal P, Luitel T, Ghimire P, Wasti S Dialogues Health. 2024; 2:100140.
PMID: 38515491 PMC: 10953870. DOI: 10.1016/j.dialog.2023.100140.
Bammert P, Schuttig W, Iashchenko I, Spallek J, Rattay P, Schneider S BMC Pediatr. 2024; 24(1):146.
PMID: 38419000 PMC: 10900680. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-024-04650-0.
Wang B, Andraweera P, Danchin M, Blyth C, Vlaev I, Ong J BMJ Open. 2024; 14(2):e076194.
PMID: 38367966 PMC: 10875525. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076194.