» Articles » PMID: 26002814

Assessment of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Using Low Radiation Dose Computed Tomography

Overview
Journal J Nucl Cardiol
Date 2015 May 24
PMID 26002814
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Cardiac CT is a non-invasive modality with the ability to estimate LVEF. However, given its limited temporal resolution and radiation, there has been initial resistance to use CT to measure LVEF. Developing an accurate, fast, low radiation dose protocol is desirable.

Objective: The objective of this study is to demonstrate that a 'low radiation dose' 64 slice cardiac computed tomography (CT) protocol is feasible and can accurately measure left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) while delivering a radiation dose lower than radionuclide angiography (RNA).

Methods: Patients undergoing RNA were prospectively screened and enrolled to undergo a 'low-dose' 64 slice CT LVEF protocol. LVEF measures, duration of each study and radiation dose between CT and RNA were compared.

Results: A total of 77 patients (mean age = 61.8 ± 12.2 years and 58 men) were analyzed. The mean LVEF measured by CT and RNA were 41.9 ± 15.2% and 39.4 ± 13.9%, respectively, (P = 0.154) with a good correlation (r = 0.863). Bland-Altman plot revealed a good agreement between the CT and RNA LVEF (mean difference of -2.4). There was good agreement between CT LVEF and RNA for identifying patients with LVEF ≤30% (kappa = 0.693) and LVEF ≥50% (kappa = 0.749). The mean dose estimated effective dose for CT and RNA were 4.7 ± 1.6 and 9.5 ± 1.0 mSv, respectively. The mean CT LVEF imaging duration (4:32 ± 3:05 minutes) was significantly shorter than the RNA image acquisition time (9:05 ± 2:36 minutes; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The results of our study suggest that low-dose CT LVEF protocol is feasible, accurate, and fast while delivering a lower radiation dose than traditional RNA.

Citing Articles

Emerging Challenges of Radiation-Associated Cardiovascular Dysfunction (RACVD) in Modern Radiation Oncology: Clinical Practice, Bench Investigation, and Multidisciplinary Care.

Lee M, Liu D, Hung S, Yu C, Chi C, Chiou W Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020; 7:16.

PMID: 32154267 PMC: 7047711. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.00016.


Sex Differences in Associations of Arterial Compliance With Coronary Artery Plaque and Calcification Burden.

Coutinho T, Yam Y, Chow B, Dwivedi G, Inacio J J Am Heart Assoc. 2017; 6(8).

PMID: 28862955 PMC: 5586449. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006079.


Review of Cardiovascular Imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology in 2016. Part 1 of 2: Positron Emission Tomography, Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance.

AlJaroudi W, Hage F J Nucl Cardiol. 2017; 24(2):649-656.

PMID: 28194727 DOI: 10.1007/s12350-017-0820-4.


Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction values obtained using invasive contrast left ventriculography, two-dimensional echocardiography, and gated single-photon emission computed tomography.

Garg N, Dresser T, Aggarwal K, Gupta V, Mittal M, Alpert M SAGE Open Med. 2016; 4:2050312116655940.

PMID: 27621804 PMC: 5006806. DOI: 10.1177/2050312116655940.


Role of cardiovascular imaging in selection of donor hearts.

Nair N, Gongora E World J Transplant. 2016; 5(4):348-53.

PMID: 26722663 PMC: 4689946. DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v5.i4.348.


References
1.
Butler J, Shapiro M, Jassal D, Jassal D, Neilan T, Neilan T . Comparison of multidetector computed tomography and two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography for left ventricular assessment in patients with heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2007; 99(2):247-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.08.021. View

2.
White H, Norris R, Brown M, Brandt P, Whitlock R, Wild C . Left ventricular end-systolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1987; 76(1):44-51. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.76.1.44. View

3.
Dewey M, Muller M, Eddicks S, Schnapauff D, Teige F, Rutsch W . Evaluation of global and regional left ventricular function with 16-slice computed tomography, biplane cineventriculography, and two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48(10):2034-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.04.104. View

4.
. Updated imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures, part 1. J Nucl Cardiol. 2001; 8(1):G5-G58. DOI: 10.1067/mnc.2001.112538. View

5.
Taylor G, HUMPHRIES J, Mellits E, Pitt B, Schulze R, Griffith L . Predictors of clinical course, coronary anatomy and left ventricular function after recovery from acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1980; 62(5):960-70. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.62.5.960. View