» Articles » PMID: 26001561

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Monthly Oral Ibandronate 100 Mg Versus Monthly Intravenous Ibandronate 1 Mg in Japanese Patients with Primary Osteoporosis

Overview
Journal Osteoporos Int
Date 2015 May 24
PMID 26001561
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled: The MOVEST study evaluated the efficacy and safety of monthly oral ibandronate versus licensed monthly IV ibandronate in Japanese osteoporotic patients. Relative BMD gains after 12 months were 5.22 % oral and 5.34 % IV, showing non-inferiority of oral to IV ibandronate (primary endpoint). No new safety concerns were identified.

Introduction: The randomized, phase 3, double-blind MOVEST (Monthly Oral VErsus intravenouS ibandronaTe) study evaluated the efficacy and safety of monthly oral ibandronate versus the licensed monthly intravenous (IV) ibandronate regimen in Japanese patients with osteoporosis.

Methods: Ambulatory patients aged ≥ 55 years with primary osteoporosis were randomized to receive oral ibandronate 100 mg/month plus monthly IV placebo, or IV ibandronate 1 mg/month plus monthly oral placebo. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority of oral versus IV ibandronate with respect to bone mineral density (BMD) gains at the lumbar spine after 12 months of treatment.

Results: Four hundred twenty-two patients were enrolled with 372 patients in the per-protocol set (183 and 189 in the oral and IV ibandronate groups, respectively). The relative change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD values for the oral and IV ibandronate groups, respectively, was 5.22 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 4.65, 5.80) and 5.34 % (95 % CI 4.78, 5.90). The least squares mean difference between the two groups was -0.23 % (95 % CI -0.97, 0.51), showing non-inferiority of oral ibandronate to IV ibandronate (non-inferiority limit = -1.60). Changes in BMD values at other sites, and bone turnover marker levels in the oral ibandronate group, were comparable with those of the IV group. The safety profile was similar to that previously demonstrated; no new safety concerns were identified.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated the non-inferiority of oral ibandronate 100 mg/month to IV ibandronate 1 mg/month (licensed dose in Japan) in increasing lumbar spine BMD in Japanese patients with primary osteoporosis.

Citing Articles

Ibandronate Suppresses Changes in Apatite Orientation and Young's Modulus Caused by Estrogen Deficiency in Rat Vertebrae.

Ishimoto T, Saito M, Ozasa R, Matsumoto Y, Nakano T Calcif Tissue Int. 2022; 110(6):736-745.

PMID: 34989822 PMC: 9108105. DOI: 10.1007/s00223-021-00940-2.


Efficacy and Safety of Oral Ibandronate versus Intravenous Zoledronic Acid on Bone Metabolism and Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Japanese Women with Osteoporosis.

Uehara M, Nakamura Y, Suzuki T, Nakano M, Takahashi J J Clin Med. 2021; 10(22).

PMID: 34830702 PMC: 8624848. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10225420.


Anti-fracture Efficacy of Monthly Risedronate Compared with That of Weekly Risedronate in Postmenopausal Korean Women with Osteoporosis: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Cho Y, Bae K, Lee D, Lee J Korean J Fam Med. 2020; 41(5):339-345.

PMID: 32447881 PMC: 7509122. DOI: 10.4082/kjfm.19.0110.


Racial difference in bioavailability of oral ibandronate between Caucasian and Taiwanese postmenopausal women.

Chiu W, Lin C, Yang W, Tsai K, Reginster J Osteoporos Int. 2019; 31(1):193-201.

PMID: 31642977 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-019-05127-y.


Phase II/III, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study of monthly delayed-release versus daily immediate-release risedronate tablets in Japanese patients with involutional osteoporosis.

Soen S, Kishimoto H, Hagino H, Sone T, Ohishi H, Fujimoto T J Bone Miner Metab. 2019; 38(1):86-98.

PMID: 31420748 DOI: 10.1007/s00774-019-01031-x.


References
1.
Hagino H, Kishimoto H, Ohishi H, Horii S, Nakamura T . Efficacy, tolerability and safety of once-monthly administration of 75mg risedronate in Japanese patients with involutional osteoporosis: a comparison with a 2.5mg once-daily dosage regimen. Bone. 2013; 59:44-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.10.017. View

2.
Nakamura T, Nakano T, Ito M, Hagino H, Hashimoto J, Tobinai M . Clinical efficacy on fracture risk and safety of 0.5 mg or 1 mg/month intravenous ibandronate versus 2.5 mg/day oral risedronate in patients with primary osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int. 2013; 93(2):137-46. PMC: 3717162. DOI: 10.1007/s00223-013-9734-6. View

3.
Nakai K, Tobinai M, Hashimoto J, Iida S, Kawanishi T . The optimal oral dose selection of ibandronate in Japanese patients with osteoporosis based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2014; 41(2):139-47. PMC: 4819509. DOI: 10.1007/s13318-014-0242-5. View

4.
Shiraki M, Kushida K, Fukunaga M, Kishimoto H, Taga M, Nakamura T . A double-masked multicenter comparative study between alendronate and alfacalcidol in Japanese patients with osteoporosis. The Alendronate Phase III Osteoporosis Treatment Research Group. Osteoporos Int. 1999; 10(3):183-92. DOI: 10.1007/s001980050214. View

5.
Mitchell D, Eusebio R, Pallone K, Kelly S, Nesbitt J, Brezovic C . Dose-proportional pharmacokinetics of risedronate on single-dose oral administration to healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol. 2000; 40(3):258-65. DOI: 10.1177/00912700022008928. View