» Articles » PMID: 26000244

Stroke Education in an Emergency Department Waiting Room: a Comparison of Methods

Overview
Date 2015 May 23
PMID 26000244
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Since the emergency department (ED) waiting room hosts a large, captive audience of patients and visitors, it may be an ideal location for conducting focused stroke education. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of various stroke education methods.

Methods: Patients and visitors of an urban ED waiting room were randomized into one of the following groups: video, brochure, one-to-one teaching, combination of these three methods, or control group. We administered a 13-question multiple-choice test to assess stroke knowledge prior to, immediately after, and at 1 month post-education to patients and visitors in the ED waiting room.

Results: Of 4 groups receiving education, all significantly improved their test scores immediately post intervention (test scores 9.4±2.5-10.3±2.0, P<0.01). At 1 month, the combination group retained the most knowledge (9.4±2.4) exceeding pre-intervention and control scores (both 6.7±2.6, P<0.01).

Conclusion: Among the various stroke education methods delivered in the ED waiting room, the combination method resulted in the highest knowledge retention at 1-month post intervention.

Citing Articles

Do health service waiting areas contribute to the health literacy of consumers? A scoping review.

McDonald C, Voutier C, Govil D, DSouza A, Truong D, Abo S Health Promot Int. 2023; 38(4).

PMID: 37440256 PMC: 10340083. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daad046.


Educational Intervention in the Emergency Department to Address Disparities in Stroke Knowledge.

Shufflebarger E, Walter L, Gropen T, Madsen T, Harrigan M, Lazar R J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022; 31(6):106424.

PMID: 35334251 PMC: 9086083. DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106424.

References
1.
Alberts M, Perry A, Dawson D, Bertels C . Effects of public and professional education on reducing the delay in presentation and referral of stroke patients. Stroke. 1992; 23(3):352-6. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.23.3.352. View

2.
Chan Y, Nagurka R, Richardson L, Zaets S, Brimacombe M, Levine S . Effectiveness of stroke education in the emergency department waiting room. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010; 19(3):209-215. DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2009.04.009. View

3.
Morgenstern L, Staub L, Chan W, Wein T, Bartholomew L, King M . Improving delivery of acute stroke therapy: The TLL Temple Foundation Stroke Project. Stroke. 2002; 33(1):160-6. DOI: 10.1161/hs0102.101990. View

4.
Sacco R, Boden-Albala B, Gan R, Chen X, Kargman D, Shea S . Stroke incidence among white, black, and Hispanic residents of an urban community: the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1998; 147(3):259-68. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009445. View

5.
Pancioli A, Broderick J, Kothari R, Brott T, Tuchfarber A, Miller R . Public perception of stroke warning signs and knowledge of potential risk factors. JAMA. 1998; 279(16):1288-92. DOI: 10.1001/jama.279.16.1288. View