» Articles » PMID: 25995741

A Systemic Review of Randomized Controlled Studies About Prevention with Pharmacologic Agents of Adhesion Formation in the Rat Uterine Horn Model

Overview
Journal Arch Med Sci
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2015 May 22
PMID 25995741
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Evaluation of treatment attempts in postoperative adhesion formation is pivotal for the prevention of several morbidities including infertility, pelvic pain, bowel obstruction, and subsequent intraoperative complications. The purpose of this systemic review was to assess the literature on the rat uterine horn model for adhesion formation and treatment modalities to prevent adhesion in the most frequently used experimental animal model.

Material And Methods: We performed a systemic review of publications from January 1(st) 2000 to December 31(st) 2013 via a PubMed search. A high number of agents were evaluated for the prevention of postoperative adhesion formation in the rat uterine horn model.

Results: According to most of the studies, adjuvants such as antiinflamatuars, antiestrogens, antioxidants were effective to prevent adhesion formation.

Conclusions: Prevention of adhesion formation is pivotal and numerous types of agents were described in the literature were summarized in this review.

Citing Articles

Ligustrazine nanoparticles nano spray's activation on Nrf2/ARE pathway in oxidative stress injury in rats with postoperative abdominal adhesion.

Yan S, Yue Y, Zeng L, Jiang C, Li W, Li H Ann Transl Med. 2019; 7(16):379.

PMID: 31555693 PMC: 6736816. DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.07.72.


Hyaluronic acid and oxidized regenerated cellulose prevent adhesion reformation after adhesiolysis in rat models.

Zhang Y, Liu Q, Yang N, Zhang X Drug Des Devel Ther. 2016; 10:3501-3507.

PMID: 27822014 PMC: 5087760. DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S103824.

References
1.
Linsky C, Diamond M, Cunningham T, Constantine B, DeCherney A, diZerega G . Adhesion reduction in the rabbit uterine horn model using an absorbable barrier, TC-7. J Reprod Med. 1987; 32(1):17-20. View

2.
Yoldemir T, Sagol S, Adakan S, Oztekin K, Ozsener S, Karadadas N . Comparison of the reduction of postoperative adhesions by two barriers, one solution, and two pharmacologic agents in the rat uterine model. Fertil Steril. 2002; 78(2):335-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03224-7. View

3.
Liakakos T, Thomakos N, Fine P, Dervenis C, Young R . Peritoneal adhesions: etiology, pathophysiology, and clinical significance. Recent advances in prevention and management. Dig Surg. 2001; 18(4):260-73. DOI: 10.1159/000050149. View

4.
Hellebrekers B, Trimbos J, Emeis J, Kooistra T . Use of fibrinolytic agents in the prevention of postoperative adhesion formation. Fertil Steril. 2000; 74(2):203-12. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00656-7. View

5.
Jamry A, Jalynski M, Piskorz L, Brocki M . Assessment of adhesion formation after laparoscopic intraperitoneal implantation of Dynamesh IPOM mesh. Arch Med Sci. 2013; 9(3):487-92. PMC: 3701981. DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2013.35345. View