» Articles » PMID: 25995685

Inter-observer Variation in Ultrasound Measurement of the Volume and Diameter of Thyroid Nodules

Overview
Journal Korean J Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2015 May 22
PMID 25995685
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Thyroid nodule measurement using ultrasonography (US) is widely performed in various clinical scenarios. The purpose of this study was to evaluate inter-observer variation in US measurement of the volume and maximum diameter of thyroid nodules.

Materials And Methods: This retrospective study included 73 consecutive patients with 85 well-defined thyroid nodules greater than 1 cm in their maximum diameter. US examinations were independently performed by using standardized measurement methods, conducted by two clinically experienced thyroid radiologists. The maximum nodule diameter and nodule volume, calculated from nodule diameters using the ellipsoid formula, were obtained by each reader. Inter-observer variations in volume and maximum diameter were determined using 95% Bland-Altman limits of agreement. The degree of inter-observer variations in volumes and the maximum diameters were compared using the Student's t test, between nodules < 2 cm in maximum diameter and those with ≥ 2 cm.

Results: The mean inter-observer difference in measuring the nodule volume was -1.6%, in terms of percentage of the nodule volume, and the 95% limit of agreement was ± 13.1%. For maximum nodule diameter, the mean inter-observer difference was -0.6%, in terms of percentage of the nodule diameter, and the 95% limit of agreement was ± 7.3%. Inter-observer variation in volume was greater in nodules of < 2 cm in maximum diameter, compared to the larger nodules (p = 0.035). However, no statistically significant difference was noted between the two groups regarding maximum nodule diameters (p = 0.511).

Conclusion: Any differences smaller than 13.1% and 7.3% in volume and maximum diameter, respectively, measured by using US for well-defined thyroid nodules of > 1 cm should not be considered as a real change in size.

Citing Articles

Standardized Ultrasound Evaluation for Active Surveillance of Low-Risk Thyroid Microcarcinoma in Adults: 2024 Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology Consensus Statement.

Lee J, Lee M, Lim H, Lee C, Sung J, Yoon J J Korean Soc Radiol. 2024; 85(6):1060-1082.

PMID: 39660311 PMC: 11625847. DOI: 10.3348/jksr.2024.0132.


The Horizon of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System in the Diagnostic Performance of Thyroid Nodules: Clinical Application and Future Perspectives.

Sharafi S, Moarefzadeh M, Moradi M touchREV Endocrinol. 2024; 20(2):81-90.

PMID: 39526062 PMC: 11548367. DOI: 10.17925/EE.2024.20.2.11.


Standardized Ultrasound Evaluation for Active Surveillance of Low-Risk Thyroid Microcarcinoma in Adults: 2024 Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology Consensus Statement.

Lee J, Lee M, Lim H, Lee C, Sung J, Yoon J Korean J Radiol. 2024; 25(11):942-958.

PMID: 39473087 PMC: 11524690. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2024.0871.


3D ultrasound guidance for radiofrequency ablation in an anthropomorphic thyroid nodule phantom.

Boers T, Braak S, Brink W, Versluis M, Manohar S Eur Radiol Exp. 2024; 8(1):115.

PMID: 39400616 PMC: 11473505. DOI: 10.1186/s41747-024-00513-6.


Segmentation-based quantitative measurements in renal CT imaging using deep learning.

Koukoutegos K, s Heeren R, De Wever L, De Keyzer F, Maes F, Bosmans H Eur Radiol Exp. 2024; 8(1):110.

PMID: 39382755 PMC: 11465135. DOI: 10.1186/s41747-024-00507-4.


References
1.
Baek J, Kim Y, Lee D, Huh J, Lee J . Benign predominantly solid thyroid nodules: prospective study of efficacy of sonographically guided radiofrequency ablation versus control condition. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 194(4):1137-42. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.3372. View

2.
Gharib H, Papini E, Paschke R, Duick D, Valcavi R, Hegedus L . American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, Associazione Medici Endocrinologi, and EuropeanThyroid Association Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the Diagnosis and Management of Thyroid Nodules. Endocr Pract. 2010; 16 Suppl 1:1-43. DOI: 10.4158/10024.GL. View

3.
Moon W, Baek J, Jung S, Kim D, Kim E, Kim J . Ultrasonography and the ultrasound-based management of thyroid nodules: consensus statement and recommendations. Korean J Radiol. 2011; 12(1):1-14. PMC: 3017873. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2011.12.1.1. View

4.
Levine R . Current guidelines for the management of thyroid nodules. Endocr Pract. 2012; 18(4):596-9. DOI: 10.4158/EP12071.CO. View

5.
Sung J, Baek J, Kim K, Lee D, Yoo H, Kim J . Single-session treatment of benign cystic thyroid nodules with ethanol versus radiofrequency ablation: a prospective randomized study. Radiology. 2013; 269(1):293-300. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13122134. View