» Articles » PMID: 25989138

Pharmacokinetics of Enrofloxacin and Ceftiofur in Plasma, Interstitial Fluid, and Gastrointestinal Tract of Calves After Subcutaneous Injection, and Bactericidal Impacts on Representative Enteric Bacteria

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2015 May 20
PMID 25989138
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study's objectives were to determine intestinal antimicrobial concentrations in calves administered enrofloxacin or ceftiofur sodium subcutaneously, and their impact on representative enteric bacteria. Ultrafiltration devices were implanted in the ileum and colon of 12 steers, which received either enrofloxacin or ceftiofur sodium. Samples were collected over 48 h after drug administration for pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis. Enterococcus faecalis or Salmonella enterica (5 × 10(5) CFU/mL of each) were exposed in vitro to peak and tail (48 h postadministration) concentrations of both drugs at each location for 24 h to determine inhibition of growth and change in MIC. Enrofloxacin had tissue penetration factors of 1.6 and 2.5 in the ileum and colon, while ciprofloxacin, an active metabolite of enrofloxacin, was less able to cross into the intestine (tissue penetration factors of 0.7 and 1.7). Ceftiofur was rapidly eliminated leading to tissue penetration factors of 0.39 and 0.25. All concentrations of enrofloxacin were bactericidal for S. enterica and significantly reduced E. faecalis. Peak ceftiofur concentration was bactericidal for S. enterica, and tail concentrations significantly reduced growth. E. faecalis experienced growth at all ceftiofur concentrations. The MICs for both organisms exposed to peak and tail concentrations of antimicrobials were unchanged at the end of the study. Enrofloxacin and ceftiofur achieved intestinal concentrations capable of reducing intestinal bacteria, yet the short exposure of ceftiofur in the intestine may select for resistant organisms.

Citing Articles

Quantifying trade-offs between therapeutic efficacy and resistance dissemination for enrofloxacin dose regimens in cattle.

Chandra Deb L, Timsina A, Lenhart S, Foster D, Lanzas C Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):20598.

PMID: 39232037 PMC: 11374901. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-70741-8.


Quantifying trade-offs between therapeutic efficacy and resistance dissemination for enrofloxacin dose regimens in cattle.

Chandra Deb L, Timsina A, Lenhart S, Foster D, Lanzas C Res Sq. 2024; .

PMID: 38659948 PMC: 11042421. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4166888/v1.


Impact of florfenicol dosing regimen on the phenotypic and genotypic resistance of enteric bacteria in steers.

Halleran J, Sylvester H, Jacob M, Callahan B, Baynes R, Foster D Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):4920.

PMID: 38418677 PMC: 10901817. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-55591-8.


Targeted dosing for susceptible heteroresistant subpopulations may improve rational dosage regimen prediction for colistin in broiler chickens.

Mead A, Toutain P, Richez P, Pelligand L Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):12822.

PMID: 37550398 PMC: 10406827. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-39727-w.


Comparisons of plasma and fecal pharmacokinetics of danofloxacin and enrofloxacin in healthy and Mannheimia haemolytica infected calves.

Beyi A, Mochel J, Magnin G, Hawbecker T, Slagel C, Dewell G Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):5107.

PMID: 35332195 PMC: 8948211. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-08945-z.