» Articles » PMID: 25987691

Potential Cytochrome P-450 Drug-drug Interactions in Adults with Metastatic Solid Tumors and Effect on Eligibility for Phase I Clinical Trials

Overview
Date 2015 May 20
PMID 25987691
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Potential cytochrome P-450 (CYP) drug-drug interactions in adults with metastatic solid tumors and their effect on eligibility for Phase I clinical trials were characterized.

Methods: This study included adult patients with metastatic solid tumors seen by a medical oncologist from January 2008 through July 2011. The medications used by these patients were identified. Each medication's potential for interacting with CYP isozymes was also characterized. Medication changes required to meet Phase I trial eligibility criteria were also reviewed.

Results: Data from 1773 patients were analyzed: 1489 were not enrolled in a Phase I trial and 284 were enrolled in a Phase I trial. Polypharmacy was significantly more prevalent in the group enrolled in a Phase I trial compared with those not enrolled (95% versus 80%, p < 0.001). The majority of patients not enrolled in a Phase I trial were taking at least one CYP isozyme inhibitor (87%) and at least one CYP isozyme inducer (45%). In a separate analysis, four Phase I trials were evaluated. Of 295 screened patients, 3.2% could not enroll due to concurrent medications. Charts from 74 enrolled patients revealed 655 concurrent medications—93 medications required further review for eligibility involving 51 (69%) of patients. Of the 93 medications, 38 (41%) were stopped and 41 (44%) were changed for the study.

Conclusion: Polypharmacy and the use of medications that interact with CYP isoyzmes were common in adult patients with metastatic solid tumors. Patients enrolling in Phase I studies often require medication changes to meet eligibility requirements.

Citing Articles

Navigating the challenges of clinical trial professionals in the healthcare sector.

Peralta G, Sanchez-Santiago B Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1400585.

PMID: 38887672 PMC: 11181308. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1400585.


Impact of Medication Reconciliation in Oncology Early Phase Studies: A Drug-Drug Interaction Retrospective Study.

Malifarge L, Deppenweiler M, Italiano A, Lortal B JCO Oncol Pract. 2023; 20(3):386-392.

PMID: 37944082 PMC: 11005900. DOI: 10.1200/OP.22.00281.


Evaluation of Clinical Pharmacy Services for Phase 1 Clinical Trials.

Saunders J, Murli S, Rudek M, Khandoobhai A, DeLisa A, Goodrich A J Hematol Oncol Pharm. 2023; 12(3):131-137.

PMID: 36698509 PMC: 9873238.


Clinical outcomes of concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors and regorafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter study.

Yekeduz E, Ozbay M, Caglayan D, Yildirim A, Erol C, Yildirim H Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022; 78(12):1973-1979.

PMID: 36266366 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-022-03403-1.


Drug-drug interactions in subjects enrolled in SWOG trials of oral chemotherapy.

Marcath L, Finley C, Wong S, Hertz D BMC Cancer. 2021; 21(1):324.

PMID: 33771105 PMC: 7995697. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08050-w.


References
1.
Beijnen J, Schellens J . Drug interactions in oncology. Lancet Oncol. 2004; 5(8):489-96. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(04)01528-1. View

2.
Riechelmann R, Tannock I, Wang L, Saad E, Taback N, Krzyzanowska M . Potential drug interactions and duplicate prescriptions among cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007; 99(8):592-600. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djk130. View

3.
Qato D, Alexander G, Conti R, Johnson M, Schumm P, Lindau S . Use of prescription and over-the-counter medications and dietary supplements among older adults in the United States. JAMA. 2008; 300(24):2867-78. PMC: 2702513. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2008.892. View

4.
Kivisto K, Kroemer H, Eichelbaum M . The role of human cytochrome P450 enzymes in the metabolism of anticancer agents: implications for drug interactions. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1995; 40(6):523-30. PMC: 1365206. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1995.tb05796.x. View

5.
Gerber D . Targeted therapies: a new generation of cancer treatments. Am Fam Physician. 2008; 77(3):311-9. View