» Articles » PMID: 25987504

The Application of Genome Editing in Studying Hearing Loss

Overview
Journal Hear Res
Date 2015 May 20
PMID 25987504
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Targeted genome editing mediated by clustered, regularly interspaced, short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated nuclease 9 (Cas9) technology has emerged as one of the most powerful tools to study gene functions, and with potential to treat genetic disorders. Hearing loss is one of the most common sensory disorders, affecting approximately 1 in 500 newborns with no treatment. Mutations of inner ear genes contribute to the largest portion of genetic deafness. The simplicity and robustness of CRISPR/Cas9-directed genome editing in human cells and model organisms such as zebrafish, mice and primates make it a promising technology in hearing research. With CRISPR/Cas9 technology, functions of inner ear genes can be studied efficiently by the disruption of normal gene alleles through non-homologous-end-joining (NHEJ) mechanism. For genetic hearing loss, CRISPR/Cas9 has potential to repair gene mutations by homology-directed-repair (HDR) or to disrupt dominant mutations by NHEJ, which could restore hearing. Our recent work has shown CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing can be efficiently performed in the mammalian inner ear in vivo. Thus, application of CRISPR/Cas9 in hearing research will open up new avenues for understanding the pathology of genetic hearing loss and provide new routes in the development of treatment to restore hearing. In this review, we describe major methodologies currently used for genome editing. We will highlight applications of these technologies in studies of genetic disorders and discuss issues pertaining to applications of CRISPR/Cas9 in auditory systems implicated in genetic hearing loss.

Citing Articles

Modern In Vitro Techniques for Modeling Hearing Loss.

Shah J, Jimenez-Jaramillo C, Lybrand Z, Yuan T, Erbele I Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(5).

PMID: 38790292 PMC: 11118046. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11050425.


Advanced Omics Techniques for Understanding Cochlear Genome, Epigenome, and Transcriptome in Health and Disease.

Tisi A, Palaniappan S, Maccarrone M Biomolecules. 2023; 13(10).

PMID: 37892216 PMC: 10605747. DOI: 10.3390/biom13101534.


The applications of CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome editing in genetic hearing loss.

Wu J, Tao Y, Deng D, Meng Z, Zhao Y Cell Biosci. 2023; 13(1):93.

PMID: 37210555 PMC: 10199548. DOI: 10.1186/s13578-023-01021-7.


Ontogeny of cellular organization and LGR5 expression in porcine cochlea revealed using tissue clearing and 3D imaging.

Moatti A, Li C, Sivadanam S, Cai Y, Ranta J, Piedrahita J iScience. 2022; 25(8):104695.

PMID: 35865132 PMC: 9294204. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104695.


Generation and Genetic Correction of USH2A c.2299delG Mutation in Patient-Derived Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Liu X, Lillywhite J, Zhu W, Huang Z, Clark A, Gosstola N Genes (Basel). 2021; 12(6).

PMID: 34070435 PMC: 8227183. DOI: 10.3390/genes12060805.


References
1.
OConnell M, Oakes B, Sternberg S, East-Seletsky A, Kaplan M, Doudna J . Programmable RNA recognition and cleavage by CRISPR/Cas9. Nature. 2014; 516(7530):263-6. PMC: 4268322. DOI: 10.1038/nature13769. View

2.
Zuris J, Thompson D, Shu Y, Guilinger J, Bessen J, Hu J . Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo. Nat Biotechnol. 2014; 33(1):73-80. PMC: 4289409. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3081. View

3.
Rong Y, Golic K . Gene targeting by homologous recombination in Drosophila. Science. 2000; 288(5473):2013-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.288.5473.2013. View

4.
Lee H, Kweon J, Kim E, Kim S, Kim J . Targeted chromosomal duplications and inversions in the human genome using zinc finger nucleases. Genome Res. 2011; 22(3):539-48. PMC: 3290789. DOI: 10.1101/gr.129635.111. View

5.
Reyon D, Tsai S, Khayter C, Foden J, Sander J, Joung J . FLASH assembly of TALENs for high-throughput genome editing. Nat Biotechnol. 2012; 30(5):460-5. PMC: 3558947. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2170. View