» Articles » PMID: 25984359

Quality of Life After Lung Resection for Lung Cancer

Overview
Journal J Thorac Dis
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2015 May 19
PMID 25984359
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Radical and palliative treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been reported to have a significant impact on the patient quality of life (QoL). The increasing improvements in lung cancer diagnosis and cures in recent years have changed the perspectives of quantity and quality of the life after cancer in these patients. However, despite a growing interest about patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in surgical oncology, we are quite distant from a routine collection of QoL data after pulmonary resection for NSCLC. The presence of this gap is due to several reasons: the lack of validated surgical-specific questionnaires, the inappropriate consideration of traditional objective parameters as surrogates of QoL outcomes and the difficulties in dealing with missing items in this type of research. However, a recent the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) survey exploring the use of QoL data in our field has revealed that almost half of the units responding to the questionnaire collect QoL informations from their patients. Increased consensus and collaboration between surgeons are needed to include routinely PROMs in randomized controlled trials. The objective of this paper is to review the best available evidence published in the literature and regarding QoL after lung resection for cancer, aiming at identifying topics deserving further investigations.

Citing Articles

Quality of Life Evaluation Before and After Pulmonary Lobe Resection for Benign Diseases: A Comparative Study Among Patients with Tuberculosis, Bronchiectasis, and Benign Lung Nodules.

Nicola A, Porosnicu T, Laitin S, Oancea C, Tudorache E Diseases. 2024; 12(12.

PMID: 39727637 PMC: 11727490. DOI: 10.3390/diseases12120307.


Assessing patient perception and preferences for outcomes in lung cancer resection surgery: a cross-sectional study.

Wong M, Pons A, De Sousa P, Proli C, Jordan S, Begum S J Thorac Dis. 2024; 16(6):3844-3853.

PMID: 38983144 PMC: 11228752. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-23-1800.


The role of patient-reported outcome and experience measures in cardio-thoracic surgery.

Pompili C, Scheenstra B, Zirafa C, Melfi F, De Rosis S, Vainieri M Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2024; 38(3).

PMID: 38490192 PMC: 11032704. DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivae025.


Comparison of Quality of Life after Robotic, Video-Assisted, and Open Surgery for Lung Cancer.

Asemota N, Maraschi A, Lampridis S, Pilling J, King J, Le Reun C J Clin Med. 2023; 12(19).

PMID: 37834873 PMC: 10573228. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12196230.


Health Outcomes with Curative and Palliative Therapies in Real World: Role of the Quality of Life Summary Score in Thoracic Oncology Patients.

Tournoy K, Adam V, Muylle I, De Rijck H, Everaert E, Eqlimi E Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(15).

PMID: 37568637 PMC: 10417517. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153821.


References
1.
Hotta K, Kiura K, Takigawa N, Yoshioka H, Hayashi H, Fukuyama H . Desire for information and involvement in treatment decisions: lung cancer patients' preferences and their physicians' perceptions: results from Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group Trial 0705. J Thorac Oncol. 2010; 5(10):1668-72. DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181f1c8cb. View

2.
Bredart A, Razavi D, Robertson C, Brignone S, Fonzo D, Petit J . Timing of patient satisfaction assessment: effect on questionnaire acceptability, completeness of data, reliability and variability of scores. Patient Educ Couns. 2002; 46(2):131-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(01)00152-5. View

3.
Fernando H, Landreneau R, Mandrekar S, Nichols F, DiPetrillo T, Meyers B . Analysis of longitudinal quality-of-life data in high-risk operable patients with lung cancer: results from the ACOSOG Z4032 (Alliance) multicenter randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014; 149(3):718-25. PMC: 4807969. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.11.003. View

4.
Perkins J, Sanson-Fisher R . An examination of self- and telephone-administered modes of administration for the Australian SF-36. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998; 51(11):969-73. DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00088-2. View

5.
Rizk N, Ghanie A, Hsu M, Bains M, Downey R, Sarkaria I . A prospective trial comparing pain and quality of life measures after anatomic lung resection using thoracoscopy or thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014; 98(4):1160-6. PMC: 4307383. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.05.028. View