» Articles » PMID: 25983820

Usefulness of SPAIR Image, Fracture Line and the Adjacent Discs Change on Magnetic Resonance Image in the Acute Osteoporotic Compression Fracture

Overview
Journal Korean J Spine
Date 2015 May 19
PMID 25983820
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Osteoporotic compression fracture is an increasing issue in this community and its diagnosis depends on the magnetic resonance images (MRI). Although T1- and T2-weighted images (T1WI and T2WI) have high sensitivity and specificity, the fat suppression technique gives more clear delineation of this abnormalities. Accordingly, we re-evaluated its exact sensitivity and specificity for the imaging diagnosis of osteoporotic compression fractures in our cases. For additional information about the osteoporotic compression fractures, we evaluate the fracture lines, fluid sign and adjacent discs change on the MRI.

Methods: Retrospectively, total 85 patients who had been diagnosed with acute osteoporotic compression fracture were enrolled. They all had been underwent MRI including T1WI, T2WI and T2-Spectral Adiabatic Inversion Recovery (SPAIR) sequence.

Results: In this study, the incidence of high signal intensity on T2-SPAIR image was very high (0.9917). The fluid sign was seen in 56.7% on the SPAIR image. The fracture lines were more observed on the T2WI than T1WI (p=0.0062). The adjacent discs change on T2WI and T2-SPAIR image were higher than T1WI (p<0.001).

Conclusion: For the acute osteoporotic compression fracture, T2-SPAIR image is the most specific sequence of the all sequences. The fluid sign is another suggestive finding when considered other studies. T2WI is more useful to find the fracture line than T1WI. Abnormal signal intensity on the adjacent discs may provide additional information for the acute osteoporotic compression fractures.

Citing Articles

Deep learning model for automated detection of fresh and old vertebral fractures on thoracolumbar CT.

Chen J, Liu S, Li Y, Zhang Z, Liao N, Shi H Eur Spine J. 2024; 34(3):1177-1186.

PMID: 39708132 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08623-w.


A Deep Learning-Based Model for Classifying Osteoporotic Lumbar Vertebral Fractures on Radiographs: A Retrospective Model Development and Validation Study.

Ono Y, Suzuki N, Sakano R, Kikuchi Y, Kimura T, Sutherland K J Imaging. 2023; 9(9).

PMID: 37754951 PMC: 10532676. DOI: 10.3390/jimaging9090187.


Traumatic vertebra and endplate fractures promote adjacent disc degeneration: evidence from a clinical MR follow-up study.

Lu X, Zhu Z, Pan J, Feng Z, Lv X, Battie M Skeletal Radiol. 2021; 51(5):1017-1026.

PMID: 34599674 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-021-03846-0.

References
1.
Smith A, Weinstein M, Mizushima A, Coughlin B, Hayden S, Lakin M . MR imaging characteristics of tuberculous spondylitis vs vertebral osteomyelitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989; 153(2):399-405. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.153.2.399. View

2.
Rajasekaran S . Thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit: the role for conservative treatment. Eur Spine J. 2009; 19 Suppl 1:S40-7. PMC: 2899715. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-1122-6. View

3.
An H, Vaccaro A, Dolinskas C, COTLER J, Balderston R, Bauerle W . Differentiation between spinal tumors and infections with magnetic resonance imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991; 16(8 Suppl):S334-8. View

4.
Hong S, Kim T, Park K . Continuous multiple vertebral compression fractures in multiple myeloma patient. Korean J Spine. 2015; 9(1):37-40. PMC: 4432383. DOI: 10.14245/kjs.2012.9.1.37. View

5.
Dai L . The relationship between vertebral body deformity and disc degeneration in lumbar spine of the senile. Eur Spine J. 1998; 7(1):40-4. PMC: 3615368. DOI: 10.1007/s005860050025. View