» Articles » PMID: 25981303

Structural Insights into Ligand Recognition and Selectivity for Classes A, B, and C GPCRs

Overview
Journal Eur J Pharmacol
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2015 May 19
PMID 25981303
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily constitutes the largest collection of cell surface signaling proteins with approximately 800 members in the human genome. GPCRs regulate virtually all aspects of physiology and they are an important class of drug targets with ~30% of drugs on the market targeting a GPCR. Breakthroughs in GPCR structural biology in recent years have significantly expanded our understanding of GPCR structure and function and ushered in a new era of structure-based drug design for GPCRs. Crystal structures for nearly thirty distinct GPCRs are now available including receptors from each of the major classes, A, B, C, and F. These structures provide a foundation for understanding the molecular basis of GPCR pharmacology. Here, we review structural mechanisms of ligand recognition and selectivity of GPCRs with a focus on selected examples from classes A, B, and C, and we highlight major unresolved questions for future structural studies.

Citing Articles

Dynamic Mechanism for Subtype Selectivity of Endocannabinoids.

Dutta S, Zhao L, Shukla D bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39554065 PMC: 11565827. DOI: 10.1101/2024.10.25.620304.


analysis of crustacean hyperglycemic hormone family G protein-coupled receptor candidates.

Kozma M, Perez-Moreno J, Gandhi N, Hernandez Jeppesen L, Durica D, Ventura T Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 14:1322800.

PMID: 38298185 PMC: 10828670. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1322800.


3DDPDs: describing protein dynamics for proteochemometric bioactivity prediction. A case for (mutant) G protein-coupled receptors.

Gorostiola Gonzalez M, van den Broek R, Braun T, Chatzopoulou M, Jespers W, IJzerman A J Cheminform. 2023; 15(1):74.

PMID: 37641107 PMC: 10463931. DOI: 10.1186/s13321-023-00745-5.


Molecular simulations of SSTR2 dynamics and interaction with ligands.

Gervasoni S, Guccione C, Fanti V, Bosin A, Cappellini G, Golosio B Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):4768.

PMID: 36959237 PMC: 10036620. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-31823-1.


New Insights into the Structure and Function of Class B1 GPCRs.

Cary B, Zhang X, Cao J, Johnson R, Piper S, Gerrard E Endocr Rev. 2022; 44(3):492-517.

PMID: 36546772 PMC: 10166269. DOI: 10.1210/endrev/bnac033.


References
1.
Tfelt-Hansen P, Saxena P, Dahlof C, Pascual J, Lainez M, Henry P . Ergotamine in the acute treatment of migraine: a review and European consensus. Brain. 1999; 123 ( Pt 1):9-18. DOI: 10.1093/brain/123.1.9. View

2.
Mosberg H . Complementarity of delta opioid ligand pharmacophore and receptor models. Biopolymers. 2000; 51(6):426-39. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0282(1999)51:6<426::AID-BIP5>3.0.CO;2-G. View

3.
Palczewski K, Kumasaka T, Hori T, Behnke C, Motoshima H, Fox B . Crystal structure of rhodopsin: A G protein-coupled receptor. Science. 2000; 289(5480):739-45. DOI: 10.1126/science.289.5480.739. View

4.
Bonner G, Meng F, Akil H . Selectivity of mu-opioid receptor determined by interfacial residues near third extracellular loop. Eur J Pharmacol. 2000; 403(1-2):37-44. DOI: 10.1016/s0014-2999(00)00578-1. View

5.
Kunishima N, Shimada Y, Tsuji Y, Sato T, Yamamoto M, Kumasaka T . Structural basis of glutamate recognition by a dimeric metabotropic glutamate receptor. Nature. 2000; 407(6807):971-7. DOI: 10.1038/35039564. View