» Articles » PMID: 25978544

Temporal Variation Overshadows the Response of Leaf Litter Microbial Communities to Simulated Global Change

Overview
Journal ISME J
Date 2015 May 16
PMID 25978544
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bacteria and fungi drive the decomposition of dead plant biomass (litter), an important step in the terrestrial carbon cycle. Here we investigate the sensitivity of litter microbial communities to simulated global change (drought and nitrogen addition) in a California annual grassland. Using 16S and 28S rDNA amplicon pyrosequencing, we quantify the response of the bacterial and fungal communities to the treatments and compare these results to background, temporal (seasonal and interannual) variability of the communities. We found that the drought and nitrogen treatments both had significant effects on microbial community composition, explaining 2-6% of total compositional variation. However, microbial composition was even more strongly influenced by seasonal and annual variation (explaining 14-39%). The response of microbial composition to drought varied by season, while the effect of the nitrogen addition treatment was constant through time. These compositional responses were similar in magnitude to those seen in microbial enzyme activities and the surrounding plant community, but did not correspond to a consistent effect on leaf litter decomposition rate. Overall, these patterns indicate that, in this ecosystem, temporal variability in the composition of leaf litter microorganisms largely surpasses that expected in a short-term global change experiment. Thus, as for plant communities, future microbial communities will likely be determined by the interplay between rapid, local background variability and slower, global changes.

Citing Articles

Response of soil fungal-community structure and function to land conversion to agriculture in desert grassland.

Kang P, Hu J, Pan Y, Qu X, Ran Y, Yang C Front Microbiol. 2024; 15:1413973.

PMID: 39318436 PMC: 11420991. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1413973.


Substrate complexity buffers negative interactions in a synthetic community of leaf litter degraders.

Abdoli P, Vulin C, Lepiz M, Chase A, Weihe C, Rodriguez-Verdugo A FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2024; 100(8).

PMID: 39020097 PMC: 11289631. DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiae102.


Climate warming restructures seasonal dynamics of grassland soil microbial communities.

Guo X, Yuan M, Lei J, Shi Z, Zhou X, Li J mLife. 2024; 1(3):245-256.

PMID: 38818216 PMC: 10989843. DOI: 10.1002/mlf2.12035.


Warming effects on grassland soil microbial communities are amplified in cool months.

Lei J, Su Y, Jian S, Guo X, Yuan M, Bates C ISME J. 2024; 18(1).

PMID: 38747385 PMC: 11170927. DOI: 10.1093/ismejo/wrae088.


The effects of litter input and increased precipitation on soil microbial communities in a temperate grassland.

Gao X, Zheng Z, Diao Z, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Ma L Front Microbiol. 2024; 15:1347016.

PMID: 38650869 PMC: 11033436. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1347016.


References
1.
Allison S, Lu Y, Weihe C, Goulden M, Martiny A, Treseder K . Microbial abundance and composition influence litter decomposition response to environmental change. Ecology. 2013; 94(3):714-25. DOI: 10.1890/12-1243.1. View

2.
Allison S, Martiny J . Colloquium paper: resistance, resilience, and redundancy in microbial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105 Suppl 1:11512-9. PMC: 2556421. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0801925105. View

3.
Cregger M, Schadt C, Mcdowell N, Pockman W, Classen A . Response of the soil microbial community to changes in precipitation in a semiarid ecosystem. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012; 78(24):8587-94. PMC: 3502934. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02050-12. View

4.
Bell C, Tissue D, Loik M, Wallenstein M, Acosta-Martinez V, Erickson R . Soil microbial and nutrient responses to 7 years of seasonally altered precipitation in a Chihuahuan Desert grassland. Glob Chang Biol. 2013; 20(5):1657-73. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12418. View

5.
Braid M, Daniels L, Kitts C . Removal of PCR inhibitors from soil DNA by chemical flocculation. J Microbiol Methods. 2003; 52(3):389-93. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-7012(02)00210-5. View