» Articles » PMID: 25977206

Individualized Relapse Prediction: Personality Measures and Striatal and Insular Activity During Reward-processing Robustly Predict Relapse

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2015 May 16
PMID 25977206
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Nearly half of individuals with substance use disorders relapse in the year after treatment. A diagnostic tool to help clinicians make decisions regarding treatment does not exist for psychiatric conditions. Identifying individuals with high risk for relapse to substance use following abstinence has profound clinical consequences. This study aimed to develop neuroimaging as a robust tool to predict relapse.

Methods: 68 methamphetamine-dependent adults (15 female) were recruited from 28-day inpatient treatment. During treatment, participants completed a functional MRI scan that examined brain activation during reward processing. Patients were followed 1 year later to assess abstinence. We examined brain activation during reward processing between relapsing and abstaining individuals and employed three random forest prediction models (clinical and personality measures, neuroimaging measures, a combined model) to generate predictions for each participant regarding their relapse likelihood.

Results: 18 individuals relapsed. There were significant group by reward-size interactions for neural activation in the left insula and right striatum for rewards. Abstaining individuals showed increased activation for large, risky relative to small, safe rewards, whereas relapsing individuals failed to show differential activation between reward types. All three random forest models yielded good test characteristics such that a positive test for relapse yielded a likelihood ratio 2.63, whereas a negative test had a likelihood ratio of 0.48.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that neuroimaging can be developed in combination with other measures as an instrument to predict relapse, advancing tools providers can use to make decisions about individualized treatment of substance use disorders.

Citing Articles

Neural responses to reward, threat, and emotion regulation and transition to hazardous alcohol use.

Kirk-Provencher K, Sloan M, Andereas K, Erickson C, Hakimi R, Penner A Alcohol Alcohol. 2024; 59(4).

PMID: 38953742 PMC: 11217988. DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agae043.


Weight gained during treatment predicts 6-month body mass index in a large sample of patients with anorexia nervosa using ensemble machine learning.

Frank G, Stoddard J, Brown T, Gowin J, Kaye W Int J Eat Disord. 2024; 57(8):1653-1667.

PMID: 38610100 PMC: 11890595. DOI: 10.1002/eat.24208.


Resting-state electroencephalography theta predicts neurofeedback treatment 4-month follow-up response in nicotine addiction.

Meng Q, Zhu Y, Yuan Y, Yang L, Liu J, Zhang X Gen Psychiatr. 2023; 36(4):e101091.

PMID: 37663053 PMC: 10471848. DOI: 10.1136/gpsych-2023-101091.


Stimulant-like subjective effects of alcohol are not related to resting-state connectivity in healthy men.

Han J, Keedy S, de Wit H Cereb Cortex. 2023; 33(16):9478-9488.

PMID: 37339883 PMC: 10656944. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhad218.


Sign-tracking modulates reward-related neural activation to reward cues, but not reward feedback.

Duckworth J, Wright H, Christiansen P, Rose A, Fallon N Eur J Neurosci. 2022; 56(7):5000-5013.

PMID: 35912531 DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15787.


References
1.
Volkow N, Baler R . Brain imaging biomarkers to predict relapse in alcohol addiction. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013; 70(7):661-3. PMC: 4827769. DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.1141. View

2.
Craig A . How do you feel--now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008; 10(1):59-70. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2555. View

3.
Gowin J, Mackey S, Paulus M . Altered risk-related processing in substance users: imbalance of pain and gain. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013; 132(1-2):13-21. PMC: 3748224. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.03.019. View

4.
Balodis I, Potenza M . Anticipatory reward processing in addicted populations: a focus on the monetary incentive delay task. Biol Psychiatry. 2014; 77(5):434-44. PMC: 4315733. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.08.020. View

5.
Stewart J, Connolly C, May A, Tapert S, Wittmann M, Paulus M . Striatum and insula dysfunction during reinforcement learning differentiates abstinent and relapsed methamphetamine-dependent individuals. Addiction. 2013; 109(3):460-71. PMC: 3945155. DOI: 10.1111/add.12403. View