» Articles » PMID: 25975179

Male-female Patient Differences in the Association Between End-of-life Discussions and Receipt of Intensive Care Near Death

Overview
Journal Cancer
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Oncology
Date 2015 May 16
PMID 25975179
Citations 53
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Patient gender plays a significant role in patient-physician communication, patients' understanding of illness, and the aggressiveness of end-of-life (EoL) care. However, little is known about the extent to which gender differences in the effects of EoL discussions on EoL care contribute to gender differences in EoL care. The current study was aimed at determining whether gender differences exist in the receipt of intensive care unit (ICU) care near death and in the association between EoL discussions and the receipt of EoL ICU care.

Methods: This was a multisite, prospective cohort study of patients (n = 353) with metastatic cancers who were identified as terminally ill at study enrollment and were interviewed at a median of 4.1 months before their deaths. Postmortem chart reviews and caregiver interviews documented ICU stays in the last week of life.

Results: Patients who received ICU care at the EoL were more likely to be male than those who did not (73% vs 52%, P = .02). After adjustments for potential confounders, male patients reporting an EoL discussion were less likely to have an ICU stay in the last week of life than male patients with no EoL discussion (adjusted odds ratio, 0.26, 95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.91; P = .04). There was no association between EoL discussions and ICU stays near death among female patients.

Conclusions: Men with advanced cancers are more likely than women to receive aggressive, nonbeneficial ICU care near death. Gender differences in the effects of EoL discussions on EoL care likely contribute to and may even explain gender differences in the receipt of ICU care in the last week of life.

Citing Articles

Age and Sex-Based Differences in Therapy Preferences Among Patients with Cancer: Evidence from a Novel Therapy Preference Scale.

Dhakal P, Wichman C, Pozehl B, Elnair R, Yellala A, Mahato K Res Sq. 2025; .

PMID: 39866883 PMC: 11760243. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5743881/v1.


How well is the female population represented in clinical trials with infusion therapies for Parkinson's disease? A systematic review and metanalysis.

Smilowska K, Carvalho V, Szejko N, Costa J, Moro E, Antonini A Eur J Neurol. 2025; 32(1):e70024.

PMID: 39757738 PMC: 11702431. DOI: 10.1111/ene.70024.


Sex-Related Differences in Mortality, Delayed Cerebral Ischemia, and Functional Outcomes in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Berli S, Barbagallo M, Keller E, Esposito G, Pagnamenta A, Brandi G J Clin Med. 2024; 13(10).

PMID: 38792323 PMC: 11122382. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13102781.


Urban people's preferences for life-sustaining treatment or artificial nutrition and hydration in advance decisions.

Wu Y, Lin T, Yang C, Wang S, Huang S BMC Med Ethics. 2024; 25(1):59.

PMID: 38762493 PMC: 11102251. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-024-01060-w.


Sex-Based Analysis of Quality Indicators of End-of-Life Care in Gastrointestinal Malignancies.

Lees C, Seow H, Chan K, Gayowsky A, Merchant S, Sinnarajah A Curr Oncol. 2024; 31(3):1170-1182.

PMID: 38534920 PMC: 10969381. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31030087.


References
1.
Johnson M, Lin M, Mangalik S, Murphy D, Kramer A . Patients' perceptions of physicians' recommendations for comfort care differ by patient age and gender. J Gen Intern Med. 2000; 15(4):248-55. PMC: 1495435. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2000.07004.x. View

2.
Teno J, Gozalo P, Bynum J, Leland N, Miller S, Morden N . Change in end-of-life care for Medicare beneficiaries: site of death, place of care, and health care transitions in 2000, 2005, and 2009. JAMA. 2013; 309(5):470-7. PMC: 3674823. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2012.207624. View

3.
Lal L, Miller L, Arbuckle R, Hung F, Feng C, Adamus A . Disparities in outpatient antidepressant prescribing patterns and determinants of resource utilization at a tertiary care cancer center. J Support Oncol. 2010; 7(6):237-44. View

4.
Jansen S, Otten W, van de Velde C, Nortier J, Stiggelbout A . The impact of the perception of treatment choice on satisfaction with treatment, experienced chemotherapy burden and current quality of life. Br J Cancer. 2004; 91(1):56-61. PMC: 2364741. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601903. View

5.
Mack J, Weeks J, Wright A, Block S, Prigerson H . End-of-life discussions, goal attainment, and distress at the end of life: predictors and outcomes of receipt of care consistent with preferences. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28(7):1203-8. PMC: 2834470. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4672. View