» Articles » PMID: 25974069

Projection of Young-old and Old-old with Functional Disability: Does Accounting for the Changing Educational Composition of the Elderly Population Make a Difference?

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2015 May 15
PMID 25974069
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study compares projections, up to year 2040, of young-old (aged 60-79) and old-old (aged 80+) with functional disability in Singapore with and without accounting for the changing educational composition of the Singaporean elderly. Two multi-state population models, with and without accounting for educational composition respectively, were developed, parameterized with age-gender-(education)-specific transition probabilities (between active, functional disability and death states) estimated from two waves (2009 and 2011) of a nationally representative survey of community-dwelling Singaporeans aged ≥ 60 years (N=4,990). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis with the bootstrap method was used to obtain the 95% confidence interval of the transition probabilities. Not accounting for educational composition overestimated the young-old with functional disability by 65 percent and underestimated the old-old by 20 percent in 2040. Accounting for educational composition, the proportion of old-old with functional disability increased from 40.8 percent in 2000 to 64.4 percent by 2040; not accounting for educational composition, the proportion in 2040 was 49.4 percent. Since the health profiles, and hence care needs, of the old-old differ from those of the young-old, health care service utilization and expenditure and the demand for formal and informal caregiving will be affected, impacting health and long-term care policy.

Citing Articles

Cognitive Frailty and Functional Disability Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review.

Tang K, Teh P, Lee S Innov Aging. 2023; 7(1):igad005.

PMID: 36908650 PMC: 9999676. DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igad005.


Using multiple imputation and intervention-based scenarios to project the mobility of older adults.

Kontto J, Paalanen L, Sund R, Sainio P, Koskinen S, Demakakos P BMC Geriatr. 2022; 22(1):311.

PMID: 35397525 PMC: 8994920. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03008-4.


Trends in functional disability and cognitive impairment among the older adult in China up to 2060: estimates from a dynamic multi-state population model.

Ansah J, Chiu C, Wei-Yan A, Min T, Matchar D BMC Geriatr. 2021; 21(1):380.

PMID: 34157986 PMC: 8218480. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02309-4.


Sitting time and associated factors among Portuguese older adults: results from Nutrition UP 65.

Sousa A, Mendes J, Guerra R, Padrao P, Moreira P, Santos A Eur J Ageing. 2020; 17(3):321-330.

PMID: 32904787 PMC: 7458983. DOI: 10.1007/s10433-019-00532-y.


40-Year Projections of Disability and Social Isolation of Older Adults for Long-Range Policy Planning in Singapore.

Ng R, Lim S, Saw S, Tan K Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(14).

PMID: 32659983 PMC: 7399997. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17144950.


References
1.
Freedman V, Martin L, Schoeni R . Recent trends in disability and functioning among older adults in the United States: a systematic review. JAMA. 2002; 288(24):3137-46. DOI: 10.1001/jama.288.24.3137. View

2.
Vogelsang E . Self-rated health changes and oldest-old mortality. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2014; 69(4):612-21. PMC: 4049148. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbu013. View

3.
de Meijer C, Koopmanschap M, D Uva T, van Doorslaer E . Determinants of long-term care spending: age, time to death or disability?. J Health Econ. 2011; 30(2):425-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.12.010. View

4.
Galenkamp H, Deeg D, Huisman M, Hervonen A, Braam A, Jylha M . Is self-rated health still sensitive for changes in disease and functioning among nonagenarians?. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2013; 68(5):848-58. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbt066. View

5.
Saw S . A decade of fertility below replacement level in Singapore. J Biosoc Sci. 1986; 18(4):395-401. DOI: 10.1017/s0021932000016424. View