Accuracy of Two Motor Assessments During the First Year of Life in Preterm Infants for Predicting Motor Outcome at Preschool Age

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2015 May 14

PMID 25970619

Citations 11

Authors

Alicia J Spittle

Katherine J Lee

Megan Spencer-Smith

Lucy E Lorefice

Peter J Anderson

Lex W Doyle

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Aim: The primary aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) and Neuro-Sensory Motor Developmental Assessment (NSMDA) over the first year of life for predicting motor impairment at 4 years in preterm children. The secondary aims were to assess the predictive value of serial assessments over the first year and when using a combination of these two assessment tools in follow-up.

Method: Children born <30 weeks' gestation were prospectively recruited and assessed at 4, 8 and 12 months' corrected age using the AIMS and NSMDA. At 4 years' corrected age children were assessed for cerebral palsy (CP) and motor impairment using the Movement Assessment Battery for Children 2nd-edition (MABC-2). We calculated accuracy of the AIMS and NSMDA for predicting CP and MABC-2 scores ≤15th (at-risk of motor difficulty) and ≤5th centile (significant motor difficulty) for each test (AIMS and NSMDA) at 4, 8 and 12 months, for delay on one, two or all three of the time points over the first year, and finally for delay on both tests at each time point.

Results: Accuracy for predicting motor impairment was good for each test at each age, although false positives were common. Motor impairment on the MABC-2 (scores ≤5th and ≤15th) was most accurately predicted by the AIMS at 4 months, whereas CP was most accurately predicted by the NSMDA at 12 months. In regards to serial assessments, the likelihood ratio for motor impairment increased with the number of delayed assessments. When combining both the NSMDA and AIMS the best accuracy was achieved at 4 months, although results were similar at 8 and 12 months.

Interpretation: Motor development during the first year of life in preterm infants assessed with the AIMS and NSMDA is predictive of later motor impairment at preschool age. However, false positives are common and therefore it is beneficial to follow-up children at high risk of motor impairment at more than one time point, or to use a combination of assessment tools.

Trial Registration: ACTR.org.au ACTRN12606000252516.

Citing Articles

Effectiveness of a training program for the acquisition of motor milestones in infants: a randomized clinical trial.

Fernandez-Sola L, Cano-Diez B, Pons-Solaz Y, Vera-Egido B, Moreno-Gonzalez S Ital J Pediatr. 2025; 51(1):23.

PMID: 39891196 PMC: 11786511. DOI: 10.1186/s13052-025-01849-4.

Psychometric properties of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale and culturally adapted or translated versions when used for infant populations internationally: A systematic review.

Mendonca B, Kong M, Coombs A, Kysh L, Sargent B Dev Med Child Neurol. 2024; 67(2):165-176.

PMID: 39234875 PMC: 11695772. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.16070.

Psychometric properties of clinician-reported and performance-based outcomes cited in a scoping review on spinal manipulation and mobilization for pediatric populations with diverse medical conditions: a systematic review.

Hayton T, Gross A, Basson A, Olson K, Ang O, Milne N J Man Manip Ther. 2023; 32(3):255-283.

PMID: 38070150 PMC: 11216262. DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2023.2269038.

Cellphone application rehabilitation management and evaluations of cardiopulmonary function and motor development in infants with congenital heart disease: a pilot study.

Zhao G, Li Z, Ma Y, Zhu Y, Ding N, Yi H World J Pediatr. 2023; 19(8):805-812.

PMID: 37285015 PMC: 10244849. DOI: 10.1007/s12519-023-00734-6.

Bayley trajectories predict school readiness better than single assessments in formerly very preterm preschoolers.

Neel M, Conroy S, Srinivas R, Taylor H, Stark A, de Silva A Pediatr Res. 2023; 94(4):1392-1399.

PMID: 37217606 DOI: 10.1038/s41390-023-02656-5.

References

Goyen T, Lui K . Longitudinal motor development of "apparently normal" high-risk infants at 18 months, 3 and 5 years. Early Hum Dev. 2002; 70(1-2):103-15. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3782(02)00094-4. View

Edwards J, Berube M, Erlandson K, Haug S, Johnstone H, Meagher M . Developmental coordination disorder in school-aged children born very preterm and/or at very low birth weight: a systematic review. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2011; 32(9):678-87. DOI: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e31822a396a. View

Spittle A, Doyle L, Boyd R . A systematic review of the clinimetric properties of neuromotor assessments for preterm infants during the first year of life. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008; 50(4):254-66. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.02025.x. View

Himpens E, Van Den Broeck C, Oostra A, Calders P, Vanhaesebrouck P . Prevalence, type, distribution, and severity of cerebral palsy in relation to gestational age: a meta-analytic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008; 50(5):334-40. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.02047.x. View

Barbosa V, Campbell S, Berbaum M . Discriminating infants from different developmental outcome groups using the Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP) item responses. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2007; 19(1):28-39. DOI: 10.1097/PEP.0b013e31802f65f9. View

Palisano R, Rosenbaum P, Walter S, Russell D, Wood E, Galuppi B . Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997; 39(4):214-23. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1997.tb07414.x. View

Darrah J, Redfern L, Maguire T, Beaulne A, Watt J . Intra-individual stability of rate of gross motor development in full-term infants. Early Hum Dev. 1998; 52(2):169-79. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3782(98)00028-0. View

Jeng S, Yau K, Chen L, Hsiao S . Alberta infant motor scale: reliability and validity when used on preterm infants in Taiwan. Phys Ther. 2000; 80(2):168-78. View

Fleuren K, Smit L, Stijnen T, Hartman A . New reference values for the Alberta Infant Motor Scale need to be established. Acta Paediatr. 2007; 96(3):424-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2007.00111.x. View

10.

Spittle A, Anderson P, Lee K, Ferretti C, Eeles A, Orton J . Preventive care at home for very preterm infants improves infant and caregiver outcomes at 2 years. Pediatrics. 2010; 126(1):e171-8. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2009-3137. View

11.

van Haastert I, de Vries L, Helders P, Jongmans M . Early gross motor development of preterm infants according to the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. J Pediatr. 2006; 149(5):617-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.07.025. View

12.

Reid S, Carlin J, Reddihough D . Rates of cerebral palsy in Victoria, Australia, 1970 to 2004: has there been a change?. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011; 53(10):907-12. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04039.x. View

13.

Fallang B, Hadders-Algra M . Postural behavior in children born preterm. Neural Plast. 2005; 12(2-3):175-82. PMC: 2565451. DOI: 10.1155/np.2005.175. View

14.

Pin T, Eldridge B, Galea M . Motor trajectories from 4 to 18 months corrected age in infants born at less than 30 weeks of gestation. Early Hum Dev. 2010; 86(9):573-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2010.07.008. View

15.

Spittle A, Orton J, Anderson P, Boyd R, Doyle L . Early developmental intervention programmes post-hospital discharge to prevent motor and cognitive impairments in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 12:CD005495. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005495.pub3. View

16.

Wang C, McGlynn E, Brook R, Leonard C, Piecuch R, Hsueh S . Quality-of-care indicators for the neurodevelopmental follow-up of very low birth weight children: results of an expert panel process. Pediatrics. 2006; 117(6):2080-92. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-1904. View

17.

Darrah J, Bartlett D, Maguire T, Avison W, Lacaze-Masmonteil T . Have infant gross motor abilities changed in 20 years? A re-evaluation of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale normative values. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014; 56(9):877-81. PMC: 4293464. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.12452. View

18.

Spencer-Smith M, Spittle A, Doyle L, Lee K, Lorefice L, Suetin A . Long-term benefits of home-based preventive care for preterm infants: a randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2012; 130(6):1094-101. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2012-0426. View

19.

Ferrari F, Gallo C, Pugliese M, Guidotti I, Gavioli S, Coccolini E . Preterm birth and developmental problems in the preschool age. Part I: minor motor problems. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012; 25(11):2154-9. DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2012.696164. View

20.

Danks M, Maideen M, Burns Y, OCallaghan M, Gray P, Poulsen L . The long-term predictive validity of early motor development in "apparently normal" ELBW survivors. Early Hum Dev. 2012; 88(8):637-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2012.01.010. View