» Articles » PMID: 25967040

SE-cadherin Serves As a Diagnostic and Predictive Parameter in Prostate Cancer Patients

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Oncology
Date 2015 May 14
PMID 25967040
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Measurement of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) advanced the diagnostic and prognostic potential for prostate cancer (PCa). However, due to PSA's lack of specificity, novel biomarkers are needed to improve risk assessment and ensure optimal personalized therapy. A set of protein molecules as potential biomarkers was therefore evaluated in serum of PCa patients.

Methods: Serum samples from patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RPE) for biopsy-proven PCa without neoadjuvant treatment were compared to serum samples from healthy subjects. Preliminary screening of 119 proteins in 10 PCa patients and 10 controls was carried out by the Proteome Profiler Antibody Array. Those markers showing distinct differences between patients and controls were then further evaluated by ELISA in the serum of 165 PCa patients and 19 controls. Uni- and multivariate as well as correlation analysis were performed to test the capability of these molecules to detect disease and predict pathological outcome.

Results: Screening showed that soluble (s)E-cadherin, E-selectin, MMP2, MMP9, TIMP1, TIMP2, Galectin and Clusterin warranted further evaluation. sE-Cadherin, TIMP1, Galectin and Clusterin were significantly over- and MMP9 under-expressed in PCa compared to controls. The concentration of sE-cadherin, MMP2 and Clusterin correlated negatively and that of MMP9 and TIMP1 positively with the Gleason Sum at prostatectomy. Only sE-cadherin significantly correlated with the highest Gleason pattern. Compared to serum PSA, sE-cadherin provided an independent and better matching predictive ability for discriminating PCas with an upgrade at RPE and aggressive tumors with a Gleason Sum ≥7.

Conclusions: sE-cadherin performed most favorably from a large panel of serum proteins in terms of diagnostic and predictive potential in curatively treatable PCa. sE-cadherin merits further investigation as a biomarker for PCa.

Citing Articles

Advancements in Oncoproteomics Technologies: Treading toward Translation into Clinical Practice.

Punetha A, Kotiya D Proteomes. 2023; 11(1).

PMID: 36648960 PMC: 9844371. DOI: 10.3390/proteomes11010002.


The Potential Role of CDH1 as an Oncogene Combined With Related miRNAs and Their Diagnostic Value in Breast Cancer.

Xie D, Chen Y, Wan X, Li J, Pei Q, Luo Y Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022; 13:916469.

PMID: 35784532 PMC: 9243438. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.916469.


Circulating Clusterin Levels and Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Namdar A, Kabiri M, Mosanan Mozaffari H, Aminifar E, Mehrad-Majd H Cancer Control. 2022; 29:10732748211038437.

PMID: 35465749 PMC: 9047800. DOI: 10.1177/10732748211038437.


Application of Proteogenomics to Urine Analysis towards the Identification of Novel Biomarkers of Prostate Cancer: An Exploratory Study.

Lima T, Barros A, Trindade F, Ferreira R, Leite-Moreira A, Barros-Silva D Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(8).

PMID: 35454907 PMC: 9031064. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14082001.


Deciphering the Molecular Machinery-Influence of sE-Cadherin on Tumorigenic Traits of Prostate Cancer Cells.

Tsaur I, Thomas A, Juengel E, Maxeiner S, Grein T, Le Q Biology (Basel). 2021; 10(10).

PMID: 34681106 PMC: 8533516. DOI: 10.3390/biology10101007.


References
1.
Yoshida G, Saya H . Inversed relationship between CD44 variant and c-Myc due to oxidative stress-induced canonical Wnt activation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013; 443(2):622-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.12.016. View

2.
Gheldof A, Berx G . Cadherins and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2013; 116:317-36. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394311-8.00014-5. View

3.
Parrish A, Catania J, Orozco J, Gandolfi A . Chemically induced oxidative stress disrupts the E-cadherin/catenin cell adhesion complex. Toxicol Sci. 1999; 51(1):80-6. DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/51.1.80. View

4.
Rupp A, Rupp C, Keller S, Brase J, Ehehalt R, Fogel M . Loss of EpCAM expression in breast cancer derived serum exosomes: role of proteolytic cleavage. Gynecol Oncol. 2011; 122(2):437-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.04.035. View

5.
Adami H . The prostate cancer pseudo-epidemic. Acta Oncol. 2010; 49(3):298-304. DOI: 10.3109/02841860903584945. View