» Articles » PMID: 25956821

Modeling Radiation-induced Cell Death: Role of Different Levels of DNA Damage Clustering

Overview
Date 2015 May 10
PMID 25956821
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Some open questions on the mechanisms underlying radiation-induced cell death were addressed by a biophysical model, focusing on DNA damage clustering and its consequences. DNA "cluster lesions" (CLs) were assumed to produce independent chromosome fragments that, if created within a micrometer-scale threshold distance (d), can lead to chromosome aberrations following mis-rejoining; in turn, certain aberrations (dicentrics, rings and large deletions) were assumed to lead to clonogenic cell death. The CL yield and d were the only adjustable parameters. The model, implemented as a Monte Carlo code called BIophysical ANalysis of Cell death and chromosome Aberrations (BIANCA), provided simulated survival curves that were directly compared with experimental data on human and hamster cells exposed to photons, protons, α-particles and heavier ions including carbon and iron. d = 5 μm, independent of radiation quality, and CL yields in the range ~2-20 CLs Gy(-1) cell(-1), depending on particle type and energy, led to good agreement between simulations and data. This supports the hypothesis of a pivotal role of DNA cluster damage at sub-micrometric scale, modulated by chromosome fragment mis-rejoining at micrometric scale. To investigate the features of such critical damage, the CL yields were compared with experimental or theoretical yields of DNA fragments of different sizes, focusing on the base-pair scale (related to the so-called local clustering), the kbp scale ("regional clustering") and the Mbp scale, corresponding to chromatin loops. Interestingly, the CL yields showed better agreement with kbp fragments rather than bp fragments or Mbp fragments; this suggests that also regional clustering, in addition to other clustering levels, may play an important role, possibly due to its relationship with nucleosome organization in the chromatin fiber.

Citing Articles

The Significance of the Response: Beyond the Mechanics of DNA Damage and Repair-Physiological, Genetic, and Systemic Aspects of Radiosensitivity in Higher Organisms.

Ostoich P Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(1.

PMID: 39796112 PMC: 11719969. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26010257.


Oxygen Effect on 0-30 eV Electron Damage to DNA Under Different Hydration Levels: Base and Clustered Lesions, Strand Breaks and Crosslinks.

Gao Y, Wang X, Cloutier P, Zheng Y, Sanche L Molecules. 2025; 29(24.

PMID: 39770123 PMC: 11680046. DOI: 10.3390/molecules29246033.


Studies on the effect of curcumin and quercetin in the liver of male albino rats exposed to gamma irradiation.

El-Hady A, Azzoz R, Soliman S, Abdelrahman I, Khalil W, Ali S Histochem Cell Biol. 2024; 162(4):299-309.

PMID: 38913116 PMC: 11364652. DOI: 10.1007/s00418-024-02300-1.


Healthy Tissue Damage Following Cancer Ion Therapy: A Radiobiological Database Predicting Lymphocyte Chromosome Aberrations Based on the BIANCA Biophysical Model.

Embriaco A, Ramos R, Carante M, Ferrari A, Sala P, Vercesi V Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(19).

PMID: 34639218 PMC: 8509193. DOI: 10.3390/ijms221910877.


4-Methylumbelliferone administration enhances radiosensitivity of human fibrosarcoma by intercellular communication.

Saga R, Matsuya Y, Takahashi R, Hasegawa K, Date H, Hosokawa Y Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):8258.

PMID: 33859324 PMC: 8050271. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-87850-3.


References
1.
Goodhead D, Nikjoo H . Track structure analysis of ultrasoft X-rays compared to high- and low-LET radiations. Int J Radiat Biol. 1989; 55(4):513-29. DOI: 10.1080/09553008914550571. View

2.
Charlton D, Nikjoo H, Humm J . Calculation of initial yields of single- and double-strand breaks in cell nuclei from electrons, protons and alpha particles. Int J Radiat Biol. 1989; 56(1):1-19. DOI: 10.1080/09553008914551141. View

3.
Goodhead D . Initial events in the cellular effects of ionizing radiations: clustered damage in DNA. Int J Radiat Biol. 1994; 65(1):7-17. DOI: 10.1080/09553009414550021. View

4.
Ballarini F, Ottolenghi A . A model of chromosome aberration induction: applications to space research. Radiat Res. 2005; 164(4 Pt 2):567-70. DOI: 10.1667/rr3365.1. View

5.
Schimmerling W, Cucinotta F, Wilson J . Radiation risk and human space exploration. Adv Space Res. 2003; 31(1):27-34. DOI: 10.1016/s0273-1177(02)00653-1. View