» Articles » PMID: 25956739

Prospective Randomised Trial Comparing Unlinked, Modular Bicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty and Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Five Years Follow-up

Overview
Journal Knee
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2015 May 10
PMID 25956739
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A significant proportion of patients with knee osteoarthritis have articular degeneration that is limited to the medial and patellofemoral compartments. The objective of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of unlinked bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BCA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at 5years in this subset of patients.

Methods: 48 patients were randomised into two groups: unlinked, modular bicompartmental arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty. Data on demographics and clinical outcomes were collected (Bartlett Knee Score, Oxford Knee Score, Knee Society Score). Data on intra-operative blood loss in both groups were also recorded.

Results: Out of the 48 patients, 26 underwent BCA and 22 had TKA. Both groups shared similar demographic profiles. At five years post surgery, there was significant improvement across all functional scores in both groups. However, there was no significant difference in outcome scores in the BCA group compared to the TKA group. The drop in serum haemoglobin levels postoperatively was 1.55 and 2.30g/dl for the BCA and TKA groups respectively (p<.001). The total amount of blood loss was 397 and 647ml respectively (p=.001).

Conclusions: Unlinked, modular BCA results in similar clinical and functional scores as TKA for medial and patellofemoral arthritis in the mid-term. Intra-operative blood loss was significantly lower in the BCA group compared to the TKA group. BCA is a viable option for a select group of young and active patients with the advantage of reduced intra-operative blood loss and equivalent functional outcomes as TKA.

Citing Articles

Comparative efficacy and safety of bicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and update meta-analysis.

Zhang R, Shen X, Yan K, Zhang X, Zhu C J Orthop Surg Res. 2025; 20(1):237.

PMID: 40045336 PMC: 11881321. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05384-6.


Current status of bicompartmental arthroplasty.

Gao Y, Yue B, Xin W Arthroplasty. 2025; 7(1):1.

PMID: 39748379 PMC: 11697474. DOI: 10.1186/s42836-024-00283-x.


Bicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: a systematic review and Delphi consensus from the European Knee Society.

Campi S, Jones G, von Knoch F, Lunebourg A, Barrett D, London N Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024; 144(11):4685-4696.

PMID: 39120833 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05434-y.


Surgical interventions for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a network meta-analysis of randomized control trials.

Bin G, Jinmin L, Cong T, Yuchen T, Xiaohui Z, Yayi X BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023; 24(1):313.

PMID: 37087428 PMC: 10122318. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06403-z.


Better PROMs and higher return-to-sport rate after modular bicompartmental knee arthroplasty than after total knee arthroplasty for medial and patellofemoral compartment osteoarthritis.

Deng W, Shao H, Tang H, Tang Q, Wang Z, Yang D Front Surg. 2023; 9:1078866.

PMID: 36684139 PMC: 9852647. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1078866.