» Articles » PMID: 25950929

Fast Monitoring of Indoor Bioaerosol Concentrations with ATP Bioluminescence Assay Using an Electrostatic Rod-type Sampler

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2015 May 8
PMID 25950929
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A culture-based colony counting method is the most widely used analytical technique for monitoring bioaerosols in both indoor and outdoor environments. However, this method requires several days for colony formation. In this study, our goal was fast monitoring (Sampling: 3 min, Detection: < 1 min) of indoor bioaerosol concentrations with ATP bioluminescence assay using a bioaerosol sampler. For this purpose, a novel hand-held electrostatic rod-type sampler (110 mm wide, 115 mm long, and 200 mm tall) was developed and used with a commercial luminometer, which employs the Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence method. The sampler consisted of a wire-rod type charger and a cylindrical collector, and was operated with an applied voltage of 4.5 kV and a sampling flow rate of 150.7 lpm. Its performance was tested using Staphylococcus epidermidis which was aerosolized with an atomizer. Bioaerosol concentrations were measured using ATP bioluminescence method with our sampler and compared with the culture-based method using Andersen cascade impactor under controlled laboratory conditions. Indoor bioaerosol concentrations were also measured using both methods in various indoor environments. A linear correlation was obtained between both methods in lab-tests and field-tests. Our proposed sampler with ATP bioluminescence method may be effective for fast monitoring of indoor bioaerosol concentrations.

Citing Articles

Recent progress in online detection methods of bioaerosols.

An T, Liang Z, Chen Z, Li G Fundam Res. 2024; 4(3):442-454.

PMID: 38933213 PMC: 10239662. DOI: 10.1016/j.fmre.2023.05.012.


Bioaerosol Sampling: Classical Approaches, Advances, and Perspectives.

Mainelis G Aerosol Sci Technol. 2022; 54(5):496-519.

PMID: 35923417 PMC: 9344602. DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2019.1671950.


Comprehensive health risk assessment of microbial indoor air quality in microenvironments.

Kumar P, Singh A, Singh R PLoS One. 2022; 17(2):e0264226.

PMID: 35213573 PMC: 8880710. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264226.


Paper-Based Airborne Bacteria Collection and DNA Extraction Kit.

Seok Y, Lee J, Kim M Biosensors (Basel). 2021; 11(10).

PMID: 34677331 PMC: 8533686. DOI: 10.3390/bios11100375.


Challenges and Perspectives for Biosensing of Bioaerosol Containing Pathogenic Microorganisms.

Li M, Wang L, Qi W, Liu Y, Lin J Micromachines (Basel). 2021; 12(7).

PMID: 34357208 PMC: 8307108. DOI: 10.3390/mi12070798.


References
1.
Rakotonirainy M, Heraud C, Lavedrine B . Detection of viable fungal spores contaminant on documents and rapid control of the effectiveness of an ethylene oxide disinfection using ATP assay. Luminescence. 2003; 18(2):113-21. DOI: 10.1002/bio.710. View

2.
Thore A, Ansehn S, Lundin A, Bergman S . Detection of bacteriuria by luciferase assay of adenosine triphosphate. J Clin Microbiol. 1975; 1(1):1-8. PMC: 274930. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.1.1.1-8.1975. View

3.
Karl D . Cellular nucleotide measurements and applications in microbial ecology. Microbiol Rev. 1980; 44(4):739-96. PMC: 373202. DOI: 10.1128/mr.44.4.739-796.1980. View

4.
Beumer R, de Vries J, Rombouts F . Campylobacter jejuni non-culturable coccoid cells. Int J Food Microbiol. 1992; 15(1-2):153-63. DOI: 10.1016/0168-1605(92)90144-r. View

5.
Terzieva S, Donnelly J, Ulevicius V, Grinshpun S, Willeke K, Stelma G . Comparison of methods for detection and enumeration of airborne microorganisms collected by liquid impingement. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996; 62(7):2264-72. PMC: 168007. DOI: 10.1128/aem.62.7.2264-2272.1996. View