» Articles » PMID: 25948868

Specific Electrophysiological Components Disentangle Affective Sharing and Empathic Concern in Psychopathy

Overview
Journal J Neurophysiol
Specialties Neurology
Physiology
Date 2015 May 8
PMID 25948868
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Empathic impairment is one of the hallmarks of psychopathy, a personality dimension associated with poverty in affective reactions, lack of attachment to others, and a callous disregard for the feelings, rights, and welfare of others. Neuroscience research on the relation between empathy and psychopathy has predominately focused on the affective sharing and cognitive components of empathy in forensic populations, and much less on empathic concern. The current study used high-density electroencephalography in a community sample to examine the spatiotemporal neurodynamic responses when viewing people in physical distress under two subjective contexts: one evoking affective sharing, the other, empathic concern. Results indicate that early automatic (175-275 ms) and later controlled responses (LPP 400-1,000 ms) were differentially modulated by engagement in affective sharing or empathic concern. Importantly, the late event-related potentials (ERP) component was significantly impacted by dispositional empathy and psychopathy, but the early component was not. Individual differences in dispositional empathic concern directly predicted gamma coherence (25-40 Hz), whereas psychopathy was inversely modulatory. Interestingly, significant suppression in the mu/alpha band (8-13 Hz) when perceiving others in distress was positively associated with higher trait psychopathy, which argues against the assumption that sensorimotor resonance underpins empathy. Greater scores on trait psychopathy were inversely related to subjective ratings of both empathic concern and affective sharing. Overall, the study demonstrates that neural markers of affective sharing and empathic concern to the same cues of another's distress can be distinguished at an electrophysiological level, and that psychopathy alters later time-locked differentiations and spectral coherence associated with empathic concern.

Citing Articles

Pain sensitivity mediates the relationship between empathy for pain and psychopathic traits.

Atanassova D, Brazil I, Tomassen C, Oosterman J Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):3729.

PMID: 39880922 PMC: 11779822. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-87892-x.


Peer Status Influences In-Group Favoritism in Pain Empathy During Middle Childhood: Evidence from Behavioral and Event-Related Potentials Studies.

Chen Y, Liang J, Han G, Yang X, Song J Brain Sci. 2025; 14(12.

PMID: 39766461 PMC: 11674303. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14121262.


Lower empathy for face mask wearers is not explained by observer's reduced facial mimicry.

McCrackin S, Ristic J PLoS One. 2024; 19(9):e0310168.

PMID: 39292707 PMC: 11410256. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310168.


Understanding empathy deficits and emotion dysregulation in psychopathy: The mediating role of alexithymia.

Burghart M, Sahm A, Schmidt S, Bulla J, Mier D PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0301085.

PMID: 38718018 PMC: 11078418. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301085.


Psychopathic callousness and perspective taking in pain processing: an ERP study.

Branchadell V, Poy R, Ribes-Guardiola P, Segarra P, Molto J Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2024; 19(1).

PMID: 38441235 PMC: 10972532. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsae022.


References
1.
Phillips W, Singer W . In search of common foundations for cortical computation. Behav Brain Sci. 1999; 20(4):657-83; discussion 683-722. DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x9700160x. View

2.
Schupp H, Cuthbert B, Bradley M, Cacioppo J, Ito T, Lang P . Affective picture processing: the late positive potential is modulated by motivational relevance. Psychophysiology. 2000; 37(2):257-61. View

3.
Carretie L, Martin-Loeches M, Hinojosa J, Mercado F . Emotion and attention interaction studied through event-related potentials. J Cogn Neurosci. 2002; 13(8):1109-28. DOI: 10.1162/089892901753294400. View

4.
Fell J, Fernandez G, Klaver P, Elger C, Fries P . Is synchronized neuronal gamma activity relevant for selective attention?. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2003; 42(3):265-72. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0173(03)00178-4. View

5.
Ruby P, Decety J . What you believe versus what you think they believe: a neuroimaging study of conceptual perspective-taking. Eur J Neurosci. 2003; 17(11):2475-80. DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02673.x. View