» Articles » PMID: 25944874

Effect of Intensive Versus Standard Blood Glucose Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Different Regions of the World: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Overview
Date 2015 May 7
PMID 25944874
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Regional variation in type 2 diabetes mellitus care may affect outcomes in patients treated with intensive versus standard blood glucose control. We sought to evaluate these differences between North America and the rest of the world.

Methods And Results: Databases were searched from their inception through December 2013. Randomized controlled trials comparing the effects of intensive therapy with standard therapy for macro- and microvascular complications in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus were selected. We calculated summary odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs with the random-effects model. The analysis included 34 967 patients from 17 randomized controlled trials (7 in North America and 10 in the rest of the world). There were no significant differences between intensive and standard therapy groups for all-cause mortality (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.13) and cardiovascular mortality (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.32). For trials conducted in North America, intensive therapy compared with standard glycemic control resulted in significantly higher all-cause mortality (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.40) and cardiovascular mortality (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.90) than trials conducted in the rest of the world (all-cause mortality OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.03; interaction P=0.006; cardiovascular mortality OR 0.89, 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.00; interaction P=0.007). Analysis of individual macro- and microvascular outcomes revealed no significant regional differences; however, the risk of severe hypoglycemia was significantly higher in trials of intensive therapy in North America (OR 3.52, 95% CI 3.07 to 4.03) compared with the rest of the world (OR 1.45, 95% CI 0.85 to 2.47; interaction P=0.001).

Conclusion: Randomization to intensive glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients was associated with increases in all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and severe hypoglycemia in North America compared with the rest of the world. Further investigation into the pathobiology or patient variability underlying these findings is warranted.

Citing Articles

Agreement Between Mega-Trials and Smaller Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Research Analysis.

Kastrati L, Raeisi-Dehkordi H, Llanaj E, Quezada-Pinedo H, Khatami F, Ahanchi N JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(9):e2432296.

PMID: 39240561 PMC: 11380108. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.32296.


Estimating the replicability of highly cited clinical research (2004-2018).

da Costa G, Neves K, Amaral O PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0307145.

PMID: 39110675 PMC: 11305584. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307145.


Causal Association of Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Lifestyle Behaviors With Peripheral Artery Disease: A Mendelian Randomization Approach.

Hoek A, van Oort S, Elders P, Beulens J J Am Heart Assoc. 2022; 11(16):e025644.

PMID: 35929454 PMC: 9496309. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025644.


Value of Patient-Centered Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

Rodriguez-Gutierrez R, Millan-Alanis J, Barrera F, McCoy R Curr Diab Rep. 2021; 21(12):63.

PMID: 34902079 PMC: 8693335. DOI: 10.1007/s11892-021-01433-0.


Performance of prediction models for nephropathy in people with type 2 diabetes: systematic review and external validation study.

Slieker R, van der Heijden A, Siddiqui M, Langendoen-Gort M, Nijpels G, Herings R BMJ. 2021; 374:n2134.

PMID: 34583929 PMC: 8477272. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n2134.


References
1.
Gerstein H, Miller M, Genuth S, Ismail-Beigi F, Buse J, Goff Jr D . Long-term effects of intensive glucose lowering on cardiovascular outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364(9):818-28. PMC: 4083508. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1006524. View

2.
Mahaffey K, Wojdyla D, Carroll K, Becker R, Storey R, Angiolillo D . Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel by geographic region in the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial. Circulation. 2011; 124(5):544-54. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.047498. View

3.
Shichiri M, Kishikawa H, Ohkubo Y, Wake N . Long-term results of the Kumamoto Study on optimal diabetes control in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2000; 23 Suppl 2:B21-9. View

4.
. A study of the effects of hypoglycemia agents on vascular complications in patients with adult-onset diabetes. VI. Supplementary report on nonfatal events in patients treated with tolbutamide. Diabetes. 1976; 25(12):1129-53. DOI: 10.2337/diab.25.12.1129. View

5.
Abraira C, Colwell J, Nuttall F, Sawin C, Nagel N, Comstock J . Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on glycemic control and complications in type II diabetes (VA CSDM). Results of the feasibility trial. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study in Type II Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1995; 18(8):1113-23. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.18.8.1113. View