» Articles » PMID: 25944371

Prospective Associations and Population Impact of Sweet Beverage Intake and Type 2 Diabetes, and Effects of Substitutions with Alternative Beverages

Overview
Journal Diabetologia
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2015 May 7
PMID 25944371
Citations 77
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: This study aimed to evaluate the association of types of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) (soft drinks, sweetened-milk beverages, sweetened tea/coffee), artificially sweetened beverages (ASB) and fruit juice with incident type 2 diabetes and determine the effects of substituting non-SSB for SSB and the population-attributable fraction of type 2 diabetes due to total sweet beverages.

Methods: Beverage consumption of 25,639 UK-resident adults without diabetes at baseline (1993-1997) in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-Norfolk study was assessed using 7-day food diaries. During 10.8 years of follow-up 847 incident type 2 diabetes cases were verified.

Results: In adjusted Cox regression analyses there were positive associations (HR [95% CI] per serving/day]) for soft drinks 1.21 (1.05, 1.39), sweetened-milk beverages 1.22 (1.05, 1.43) and ASB 1.22 (1.11, 1.33), but not for sweetened tea/coffee 0.98 (0.94, 1.02) or fruit juice 1.01 (0.88, 1.15). Further adjustment for adiposity attenuated the association of ASB, HR 1.06 (0.93, 1.20). There was a positive dose-response relationship with total sweet beverages: HR per 5% energy 1.18 (1.11, 1.26). Substituting ASB for any SSB did not reduce the incidence in analyses accounting for energy intake and adiposity. Substituting one serving/day of water or unsweetened tea/coffee for soft drinks and for sweetened-milk beverages reduced the incidence by 14%-25%. If sweet beverage consumers reduced intake to below 2% energy, 15% of incident diabetes might be prevented.

Conclusions/interpretation: The consumption of soft drinks, sweetened-milk beverages and energy from total sweet beverages was associated with higher type 2 diabetes risk independently of adiposity. Water or unsweetened tea/coffee appear to be suitable alternatives to SSB for diabetes prevention. These findings support the implementation of population-based interventions to reduce SSB consumption and increase the consumption of suitable alternatives.

Citing Articles

Carbonated Beverage, Fruit Drink, and Water Consumption and Risk of Acute Stroke: the INTERSTROKE Case-Control Study.

Smyth A, Hankey G, Damasceno A, Iversen H, Oveisgharan S, Alhussain F J Stroke. 2024; 26(3):391-402.

PMID: 39326863 PMC: 11471353. DOI: 10.5853/jos.2024.01543.


Artificial sweeteners and risk of incident cardiovascular disease and mortality: evidence from UK Biobank.

Sun T, Yang J, Lei F, Huang X, Liu W, Zhang X Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024; 23(1):233.

PMID: 38965574 PMC: 11225337. DOI: 10.1186/s12933-024-02333-9.


Effects of sugary drinks, coffee, tea and fruit juice on incidence rate, mortality and cardiovascular complications of type2 diabetes patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ding P, Yue W, Wang X, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Guo X J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2024; 23(1):1113-1123.

PMID: 38932853 PMC: 11196440. DOI: 10.1007/s40200-024-01396-5.


Estimated reductions in type 2 diabetes burden through nutrition policies in AZAR cohort population: A PRIME microsimulation study for primary health care.

Pourmoradian S, Kalantari N, Eini-Zinab H, Ostadrahimi A, Tabrizi J, Faramarzi E Health Promot Perspect. 2024; 14(1):53-60.

PMID: 38623351 PMC: 11016142. DOI: 10.34172/hpp.42452.


Longitudinal changes in diet quality and food intake before and after diabetes awareness in American adults: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study.

Cha E, Choi Y, Bancks M, Faulkner M, Dunbar S, Umpierrez G BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2024; 12(2).

PMID: 38453235 PMC: 10921527. DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003800.


References
1.
Welch A, McTaggart A, Mulligan A, Luben R, Walker N, Khaw K . DINER (Data Into Nutrients for Epidemiological Research) - a new data-entry program for nutritional analysis in the EPIC-Norfolk cohort and the 7-day diary method. Public Health Nutr. 2002; 4(6):1253-65. DOI: 10.1079/phn2001196. View

2.
Yang Q, Zhang Z, Gregg E, Flanders W, Merritt R, Hu F . Added sugar intake and cardiovascular diseases mortality among US adults. JAMA Intern Med. 2014; 174(4):516-24. PMC: 10910551. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.13563. View

3.
Eshak E, Iso H, Mizoue T, Inoue M, Noda M, Tsugane S . Soft drink, 100% fruit juice, and vegetable juice intakes and risk of diabetes mellitus. Clin Nutr. 2012; 32(2):300-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.08.003. View

4.
Pan A, Sun Q, Bernstein A, Schulze M, Manson J, Stampfer M . Red meat consumption and mortality: results from 2 prospective cohort studies. Arch Intern Med. 2012; 172(7):555-63. PMC: 3712342. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.2287. View

5.
Miller P, McKinnon R, Krebs-Smith S, Subar A, Chriqui J, Kahle L . Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption in the U.S.: novel assessment methodology. Am J Prev Med. 2013; 45(4):416-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.05.014. View