» Articles » PMID: 25940098

Intraparietal Regions Play a Material General Role in Working Memory: Evidence Supporting an Internal Attentional Role

Overview
Specialties Neurology
Psychology
Date 2015 May 6
PMID 25940098
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Determining the role of intraparietal sulcus (IPS) regions in working memory (WM) remains a topic of considerable interest and lack of clarity. One group of hypotheses, the internal attention view, proposes that the IPS plays a material general role in maintaining information in WM. An alternative viewpoint, the pure storage account, proposes that the IPS in each hemisphere maintains material specific (e.g., left--phonological; right--visuospatial) information. Yet, adjudication between competing theoretical perspectives is complicated by divergent findings from different methodologies and their use of different paradigms, perhaps most notably between functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electroencephalography (EEG). For example, fMRI studies typically use full field stimulus presentations and report bilateral IPS activation, whereas EEG studies direct attention to a single hemifield and report a contralateral bias in both hemispheres. Here, we addressed this question by applying a regions-of-interest fMRI approach to elucidate IPS contributions to WM. Importantly, we manipulated stimulus type (verbal, visuospatial) and the cued hemifield to assess the degree to which IPS activations reflect stimulus specific or stimulus general processing consistent with the pure storage or internal attention hypotheses. These data revealed significant contralateral bias along regions IPS0-5 regardless of stimulus type. Also present was a weaker stimulus-based bias apparent in stronger left lateralized activations for verbal stimuli and stronger right lateralized activations for visuospatial stimuli. However, there was no consistent stimulus-based lateralization of activity. Thus, despite the observation of stimulus-based modulation of spatial lateralization this pattern was bilateral. As such, although it is quantitatively underspecified, our results are overall more consistent with an internal attention view that the IPS plays a material general role in refreshing the contents of WM.

Citing Articles

Transcranial alternating current stimulation over multiple brain areas with non-zero phase delays other than 180 degrees modulates visuospatial working memory performance.

Park J, Lee S, Park S, Lee C, Kim S, Im C Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):12710.

PMID: 37543713 PMC: 10404219. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-39960-3.


Causal Evidence for a Role of Theta and Alpha Oscillations in the Control of Working Memory.

Riddle J, Scimeca J, Cellier D, Dhanani S, DEsposito M Curr Biol. 2020; 30(9):1748-1754.e4.

PMID: 32275881 PMC: 7202975. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.02.065.


A brief comparative review of primate posterior parietal cortex: A novel hypothesis on the human toolmaker.

Kastner S, Chen Q, Jeong S, Mruczek R Neuropsychologia. 2017; 105:123-134.

PMID: 28159617 PMC: 5537042. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.01.034.


Induced and Evoked Human Electrophysiological Correlates of Visual Working Memory Set-Size Effects at Encoding.

Gurariy G, Killebrew K, Berryhill M, Caplovitz G PLoS One. 2016; 11(11):e0167022.

PMID: 27902738 PMC: 5130241. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167022.


Decoding information about dynamically occluded objects in visual cortex.

Erlikhman G, Caplovitz G Neuroimage. 2016; 146:778-788.

PMID: 27663987 PMC: 5322156. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.024.


References
1.
Barrouillet P, Camos V . Interference: unique source of forgetting in working memory?. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009; 13(4):145-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.002. View

2.
Sheremata S, Bettencourt K, Somers D . Hemispheric asymmetry in visuotopic posterior parietal cortex emerges with visual short-term memory load. J Neurosci. 2010; 30(38):12581-8. PMC: 3767385. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2689-10.2010. View

3.
Mitchell D, Cusack R . Flexible, capacity-limited activity of posterior parietal cortex in perceptual as well as visual short-term memory tasks. Cereb Cortex. 2007; 18(8):1788-98. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhm205. View

4.
Konen C, Kastner S . Representation of eye movements and stimulus motion in topographically organized areas of human posterior parietal cortex. J Neurosci. 2008; 28(33):8361-75. PMC: 2685070. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1930-08.2008. View

5.
Friston K, Frith C, Turner R, Frackowiak R . Characterizing evoked hemodynamics with fMRI. Neuroimage. 1995; 2(2):157-65. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1995.1018. View