» Articles » PMID: 25937905

Evolution of Mating Behavior Between Two Populations Adapting to Common Environmental Conditions

Overview
Journal Ecol Evol
Date 2015 May 5
PMID 25937905
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Populations from the same species may be differentiated across contrasting environments, potentially affecting reproductive isolation among them. When such populations meet in a novel common environment, this isolation may be modified by biotic or abiotic factors. Curiously, the latter have been overlooked. We filled this gap by performing experimental evolution of three replicates of two populations of Drosophila subobscura adapting to a common laboratorial environment, and simulated encounters at three time points during this process. Previous studies showed that these populations were highly differentiated for several life-history traits and chromosomal inversions. First, we show initial differentiation for some mating traits, such as assortative mating and male mating rate, but not others (e.g., female mating latency). Mating frequency increased during experimental evolution in both sets of populations. The assortative mating found in one population remained constant throughout the adaptation process, while disassortative mating of the other population diminished across generations. Additionally, differences in male mating rate were sustained across generations. This study shows that mating behavior evolves rapidly in response to adaptation to a common abiotic environment, although with a complex pattern that does not correspond to the quick convergence seen for life-history traits.

Citing Articles

Experimental Design, Population Dynamics, and Diversity in Microbial Experimental Evolution.

Van den Bergh B, Swings T, Fauvart M, Michiels J Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2018; 82(3).

PMID: 30045954 PMC: 6094045. DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.00008-18.


Gene expression clines reveal local adaptation and associated trade-offs at a continental scale.

Porcelli D, Westram A, Pascual M, Gaston K, Butlin R, Snook R Sci Rep. 2016; 6:32975.

PMID: 27599812 PMC: 5013434. DOI: 10.1038/srep32975.

References
1.
Hosken D, Garner T, Ward P . Sexual conflict selects for male and female reproductive characters. Curr Biol. 2001; 11(7):489-93. DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00146-4. View

2.
Martin O, Hosken D . The evolution of reproductive isolation through sexual conflict. Nature. 2003; 423(6943):979-82. DOI: 10.1038/nature01752. View

3.
Gilchrist G, Huey R, Balanya J, Pascual M, Serra L . A time series of evolution in action: a latitudinal cline in wing size in South American Drosophila subobscura. Evolution. 2004; 58(4):768-80. DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00410.x. View

4.
Crudgington H, Beckerman A, Brustle L, Green K, Snook R . Experimental removal and elevation of sexual selection: does sexual selection generate manipulative males and resistant females?. Am Nat. 2005; 165 Suppl 5:S72-87. DOI: 10.1086/429353. View

5.
Snook R, Robertson A, Crudgington H, Ritchie M . Experimental manipulation of sexual selection and the evolution of courtship song in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Behav Genet. 2005; 35(3):245-55. DOI: 10.1007/s10519-005-3217-0. View