» Articles » PMID: 25937762

Comparison of Resident Operative Case Logs During a Surgical Oncology Rotation in the United States and an International Rotation in India

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2015 May 5
PMID 25937762
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study compared the operative case log experience between rotations during General Surgery residency in the United States and an international rotation in India. A resident from the General Surgery residency program at University of Nebraska Medical Center participated in an international rotation in Surgical Oncology at Mehdi Nawaz Jung Institute of Oncology in Hyderabad, India for 3 months in 2009. The operative case log of this resident (INT) was compared to those of another resident (US) on a rotation in surgical oncology at the parent institution during the same time period. Both institutions were tertiary care centers. We noted that the INT resident performed a greater number of cases (132) when compared to the US resident (61). The INT resident also performed cases in a wider variety of disease categories such as: head and neck (26 %), gynecology (19 %), breast (14 %) and urology (4 %). In contrast, abdominal cases accounted for 68 % of the cases performed by the US resident with fewer cases in the other categories. The INT resident performed 98 % of the cases by the open approach, whereas the US resident performed only 81 % of cases by the open approach, with the remaining 19 % of cases performed by the laparoscopic approach. The results demonstrate that the INT resident performed a greater number of operative cases when compared to a resident (US) at the parent institution, and performed cases in more diverse disease categories with an emphasis on the open operative approach.

Citing Articles

Qualitative Analysis of the Host-Perceived Impact of Unidirectional Global Surgery Training in Kijabe, Kenya: Benefits, Challenges, and a Desire for Bidirectional Exchange.

Zivanov C, Joseph J, Pereira D, MacLeod J, Kauffmann R World J Surg. 2022; 46(11):2570-2584.

PMID: 35976431 PMC: 9383670. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06692-w.

References
1.
Burkholder H, Cofer J . Rural surgery training: a survey of program directors. J Am Coll Surg. 2007; 204(3):416-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.12.014. View

2.
Damadi A, Davis A, Saxe A, Apelgren K . ACGME duty-hour restrictions decrease resident operative volume: a 5-year comparison at an ACGME-accredited university general surgery residency. J Surg Educ. 2007; 64(5):256-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2007.07.008. View

3.
Jayaraman S, Ayzengart A, Goetz L, Ozgediz D, Farmer D . Global health in general surgery residency: a national survey. J Am Coll Surg. 2009; 208(3):426-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.11.014. View

4.
DiMaggio P, Waer A, Desmarais T, Sozanski J, Timmerman H, Lopez J . The use of a lightly preserved cadaver and full thickness pig skin to teach technical skills on the surgery clerkship--a response to the economic pressures facing academic medicine today. Am J Surg. 2010; 200(1):162-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.07.039. View

5.
Carson J, Smith L, Are M, Edney J, Azarow K, Mercer D . National trends in minimally invasive and open operative experience of graduating general surgery residents: implications for surgical skills curricula development?. Am J Surg. 2011; 202(6):720-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.06.045. View