» Articles » PMID: 25934783

Assessment of Periprocedural Hemodynamic Changes in Arteriovenous Malformation Vessels by Endovascular Dual-sensor Guidewire

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Neurology
Date 2015 May 3
PMID 25934783
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Endovascular embolization is an important modality in the treatment of brain AVMs. Nowadays staged embolization is the method of choice for the prevention of perioperative hemorrhagic complications. Current theory suggests that simultaneous occlusion of more than 60% of AVM volume induces significant redistribution local blood flow. That, in turn, may lead to hemorrhage due to AVM rupture. Aside from angiographic findings, there is still no method that predicts the degree of safe partial embolization. Intraluminal measurement of flow velocity and pressure in the vicinity of the AVM nidus might allow detecting the changes in local hemodynamics. That can provide a valuable data and shed the light on the origin of vascular catastrophes. Ten patients underwent 12 embolization sessions with intraluminal flow velocity and pressure monitoring. The measurements were performed by dual-sensor guidewire. The "Combomap" (Volcano) system with Combowire microguidewires was chosen for measurements, as there is a documented experience of safe use of said guidewires in the cerebral vasculature. The findings observed during the study matched empirical data as well as the current physiological hypothesis of AVM hemorrhage. In conjunction with DSA runs, intraluminal flow velocity and pressure monitoring has the potential to become a valuable tool in AVM treatment.

Citing Articles

Numerical Assessment of the Risk of Abnormal Endothelialization for Diverter Devices: Clinical Data Driven Numerical Study.

Tikhvinskii D, Kuianova J, Kislitsin D, Orlov K, Gorbatykh A, Parshin D J Pers Med. 2022; 12(4).

PMID: 35455768 PMC: 9025183. DOI: 10.3390/jpm12040652.


Single-Stage Combined Embolization and Resection for Spetzler-Martin Grade III/IV/V Arteriovenous Malformations: A Single-Center Experience and Literature Review.

Chen Y, Li R, Ma L, Zhao Y, Yu T, Wang H Front Neurol. 2020; 11:570198.

PMID: 33193013 PMC: 7658368. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.570198.


Complications in pediatric interventional neuroradiology management. Reflections on a personal experience.

Rodesch G, Smajda S Interv Neuroradiol. 2020; 26(6):741-751.

PMID: 32588707 PMC: 7724602. DOI: 10.1177/1591019920935311.


Fractional Flow Assessment for the Evaluation of Intracranial Atherosclerosis: A Feasibility Study.

Miao Z, Liebeskind D, Lo W, Liu L, Pu Y, Leng X Interv Neurol. 2016; 5(1-2):65-75.

PMID: 27610123 PMC: 4934485. DOI: 10.1159/000444333.

References
1.
Tournade A, Riquelme C . Advances in the endovascular treatment of intracranial arteriovenous malformations. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2011; 2(3):315-20. PMC: 3181611. View

2.
Spetzler R, Wilson C, Weinstein P, Mehdorn M, Townsend J, Telles D . Normal perfusion pressure breakthrough theory. Clin Neurosurg. 1978; 25:651-72. DOI: 10.1093/neurosurgery/25.cn_suppl_1.651. View

3.
Zacharia B, Bruce S, Appelboom G, Connolly Jr E . Occlusive hyperemia versus normal perfusion pressure breakthrough after treatment of cranial arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2011; 23(1):147-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2011.09.005. View

4.
Ferns S, Schneiders J, Siebes M, van den Berg R, van Bavel E, Majoie C . Intracranial blood-flow velocity and pressure measurements using an intra-arterial dual-sensor guidewire. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009; 31(2):324-6. PMC: 7964145. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1718. View

5.
Duong D, Young W, Vang M, Sciacca R, Mast H, Koennecke H . Feeding artery pressure and venous drainage pattern are primary determinants of hemorrhage from cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Stroke. 1998; 29(6):1167-76. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.29.6.1167. View