» Articles » PMID: 25922251

Prospective, Randomized Comparison of 2 Methods of Cold Snare Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyps

Overview
Date 2015 Apr 30
PMID 25922251
Citations 45
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Both cold-only snare and hot polypectomy snare are used for the removal of small colorectal polyps.

Objective: To compare the outcome of cold snare polypectomy of small colorectal polyps with a snare exclusively designed as a cold snare versus cold snare polypectomy by using a traditional polypectomy snare.

Design: Prospective, randomized, controlled study.

Setting: Municipal hospital in Japan.

Interventions: Patients with colorectal polyps 10 mm or smaller in diameter were randomized to dedicated cold snare (dedicated cold snare group) or traditional cold snare (traditional cold snare group). The primary outcome measure was complete resection rates by cold snaring based on pathological examination. Secondary outcomes included bleeding within 2 weeks after polypectomy and identification of submucosal arteries and injured arteries in the resected specimens.

Results: Seventy-six patients having 210 eligible polyps were randomized: dedicated cold snare group, N = 37 (98 polyps) and traditional cold snare group, N = 39 (112 polyps). Patient demographic characteristics including the number, size, and shape of the polyps removed were similar in the 2 groups. The complete resection rate was significantly greater with the dedicated cold than with the traditional cold snare (91% [89/98] vs 79% [88/112], P = .015), with a marked difference with 8- to 10-mm polyps, both flat and pedunculated. Immediate bleeding and hematochezia rates were similar (19% vs 21%, P = .86; 5.4% vs 7.7%, P = .69). No delayed bleeding occurred. Histology demonstrated a similar prevalence of arteries and injured arteries in the submucosa (33% [32/96] vs 30% [31/104], P = .59; 3.1% [3/96] vs 6.7% [7/104], P = .24).

Limitations: Small sample size, single-center study.

Conclusion: Polypectomy by using a dedicated cold snare resulted in complete polyp removal more often than did cold snaring with a traditional snare, especially polyps 8 to 10 mm in diameter, whether flat or pedunculated. (

Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT02036047.)

Citing Articles

Mechanism behind reduced resection ability of bent snares during cold snare polypectomy.

Hirose R, Yoshida T, Yoshida N, Bandou R, Ikegaya H, Nakaya T Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):31111.

PMID: 39730939 PMC: 11681012. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-82365-z.


Risk factors for unclear margin in cold snare polypectomy for colorectal polyp.

Ikeda R, Kaneko H, Sato H, Anan H, Suzuki Y, Ikeda A Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024; 36(12):1404-1409.

PMID: 39324929 PMC: 11527374. DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002845.


Cold snare polypectomy versus cold endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polyps: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Moond V, Loganathan P, Malik S, Dahiya D, Mohan B, Ramai D Clin Endosc. 2024; 57(6):747-758.

PMID: 39188119 PMC: 11637670. DOI: 10.5946/ce.2024.081.


Cold snare polypectomy: A closer look at the efficacy and limitations for polyps 10-20 mm in size.

Chaptini L, Jalloul S, Karam K World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2024; 16(8):445-450.

PMID: 39155992 PMC: 11325874. DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i8.445.


The Safety of Cold Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy in Polyps 10-20 mm: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ali S, Khetpal N, Fatima M, Hussain S, Ali A, Khan M Cureus. 2024; 16(4):e58462.

PMID: 38765346 PMC: 11100549. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58462.