» Articles » PMID: 25922095

Quality Improvement and Person-centredness: a Participatory Mixed Methods Study to Develop the 'always Event' Concept for Primary Care

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2015 Apr 30
PMID 25922095
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: (1) To ascertain from patients what really matters to them on a personal level of such high importance that it should 'always happen' when they interact with healthcare professionals and staff groups. (2) To critically review existing criteria for selecting 'always events' (AEs) and generate a candidate list of AE examples based on the patient feedback data.

Design: Mixed methods study informed by participatory design principles.

Subjects And Setting: Convenience samples of patients with a long-term clinical condition in Scottish general practices.

Results: 195 patients from 13 general practices were interviewed (n=65) or completed questionnaires (n=130). 4 themes of high importance to patients were identified from which examples of potential 'AEs' (n=8) were generated: (1) emotional support, respect and kindness (eg, "I want all practice team members to show genuine concern for me at all times"); (2) clinical care management (eg, "I want the correct treatment for my problem"); (3) communication and information (eg, "I want the clinician who sees me to know my medical history") and (4) access to, and continuity of, healthcare (eg, "I want to arrange appointments around my family and work commitments"). Each 'AE' was linked to a system process or professional behaviour that could be measured to facilitate improvements in the quality of patient care.

Conclusions: This study is the first known attempt to develop the AE concept as a person-centred approach to quality improvement in primary care. Practice managers were able to collect data from patients on what they 'always want' in terms of expectations related to care quality from which a list of AE examples was generated that could potentially be used as patient-driven quality improvement (QI) measures. There is strong implementation potential in the Scottish health service. However, further evaluation of the utility of the method is also necessary.

Citing Articles

Patients and Healthcare Providers' Perspectives on Patient Experience Factors and a Model of Patient-Centered Care Communication: A Systematic Review.

Kim E, Koo Y, Nam I Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(11).

PMID: 38891165 PMC: 11172126. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12111090.


Reframing Patient Experience Approaches and Methods to Achieve Patient-Centeredness in Healthcare: Scoping Review.

Kim E, Nam I, Koo Y Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(15).

PMID: 35954517 PMC: 9367952. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159163.


Patient Experience Monitor (PEM): The Development of New Short-Form Picker Experience Questionnaires for Hospital Patients with a Wide Range of Literacy Levels.

Bastemeijer C, Boosman H, Zandbelt L, Timman R, de Boer D, Hazelzet J Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2020; 11:221-230.

PMID: 33312007 PMC: 7725101. DOI: 10.2147/PROM.S274015.


"What counts can't always be measured": a qualitative exploration of general practitioners' conceptualisation of quality for community pharmacy services.

Watson M, Silver K, Watkins R BMC Fam Pract. 2020; 21(1):244.

PMID: 33248452 PMC: 7700702. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-020-01319-2.


Using Always Events to derive patient-centred quality improvement priorities in a specialist primary care service providing care to a homeless population.

McCallum M, McNab D, McKay J BMJ Open Qual. 2019; 8(1):e000507.

PMID: 31259272 PMC: 6567940. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000507.


References
1.
Hankins M, Fraser A, Hodson A, Hooley C, Smith H . Measuring patient satisfaction for the Quality and Outcomes Framework. Br J Gen Pract. 2007; 57(542):737-40. PMC: 2151789. View

2.
Epstein R, Fiscella K, Lesser C, Stange K . Why the nation needs a policy push on patient-centered health care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010; 29(8):1489-95. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0888. View

3.
Coulter A, Ellins J . Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients. BMJ. 2007; 335(7609):24-7. PMC: 1910640. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39246.581169.80. View

4.
Paddison C, Elliott M, Parker R, Staetsky L, Lyratzopoulos G, Campbell J . Should measures of patient experience in primary care be adjusted for case mix? Evidence from the English General Practice Patient Survey. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012; 21(8):634-40. PMC: 3402750. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000737. View

5.
Law S, Haman H, Cameron N, Staples I . GP peer appraisal in Scotland: an ongoing and developing exercise in quality. Educ Prim Care. 2009; 20(2):99-103. DOI: 10.1080/14739879.2009.11493774. View