Acute and Long-Term Outcomes of Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Using the Second-Generation Cryoballoon Versus Open-Irrigated Radiofrequency: A Multicenter Experience
Overview
Physiology
Authors
Affiliations
Introduction: There are limited comparative data on catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (CAAF) using the second-generation cryoballoon (CB-2) versus point-by-point radiofrequency (RF). This study examines the acute/long-term CAAF outcomes using these 2 strategies.
Methods And Results: In this multicenter, retrospective, nonrandomized analysis, procedural and clinical outcomes of 1,196 patients (76% with paroxysmal AF) undergoing CAAF using CB-2 (n = 773) and open-irrigated, non-force sensing RF (n = 423) were evaluated. Pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in 98% with CB-2 and 99% with RF (P = 0.168). CB-2 was associated with shorter ablation time (40 ± 14 min vs. 66 ± 26 min; P < 0.001) and procedure time (145 ± 49 minutes vs. 188 ± 42 minutes; P < 0.001), but greater fluoroscopic utilization (29 ± 13 minutes vs. 23 ± 14 minutes; P < 0.001). While transient (7.6% vs. 0%; P < 0.001) and persistent (1.2% vs. 0%; P = 0.026) phrenic nerve palsy occurred exclusively with CB-2, other adverse event rates were similar between CB-2 (1.6%) and RF (2.6%); P = 0.207. However, freedom from AF/atrial flutter/tachycardia at 12 months following a single procedure without antiarrhythmic therapy was greater with CB-2 (76.6%) versus RF (60.4%); P < 0.001. While this difference was evident in patients with paroxysmal AF (P < 0.001), it did not reach significance in those with persistent AF (P = 0.089). Additionally, CB-2 was associated with reduced long-term need for antiarrhythmic therapy (16.7% vs. 22.0%; P = 0.024) and repeat ablations (14.6% vs. 24.1%; P < 0.001).
Conclusion: In this multicenter, retrospective, nonrandomized study, CAAF using CB-2 coupled with RF as occasionally required was associated with greater freedom from atrial arrhythmias at 12 months following a single procedure without antiarrhythmic therapy when compared to open-irrigated, non-force sensing RF, alone.
Pulsed-field- vs. cryoballoon-based pulmonary vein isolation: lessons from repeat procedures.
Lemoine M, Obergassel J, Jaeckle S, Nies M, Taraba S, Mencke C Europace. 2024; 26(9).
PMID: 39166530 PMC: 11363872. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae221.
Hu T, Chen T, Maduray K, Han W, Zhong J Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 25(6):191.
PMID: 39076314 PMC: 11270097. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2506191.
Ballatore A, Negrello E, Gatti M, Matta M, Desalvo P, Marcialis L J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023; 10(9).
PMID: 37754825 PMC: 10531798. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd10090396.
Melby D, Tholakanahalli V, Itah R, Abdelhadi R, Sengupta J, Gornick C Heart Rhythm O2. 2023; 3(6Part A):665-672.
PMID: 36589915 PMC: 9795308. DOI: 10.1016/j.hroo.2022.09.013.
Bertaglia E, Iacopino S, Verlato R, Arena G, Pieragnoli P, Tondo C Clin Cardiol. 2022; 46(2):142-150.
PMID: 36448243 PMC: 9933101. DOI: 10.1002/clc.23951.