» Articles » PMID: 25913651

Potential Explosion Hazard of Carbonaceous Nanoparticles: Explosion Parameters of Selected Materials

Overview
Journal J Hazard Mater
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2015 Apr 28
PMID 25913651
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Following a previous explosion screening study, we have conducted concentration and ignition energy scans on several carbonaceous nanopowders: fullerene, SWCNT, carbon black, MWCNT, graphene, CNF, and graphite. We have measured minimum explosive concentration (MEC), minimum ignition energy (MIE), and minimum ignition temperature (MITcloud) for these materials. The nanocarbons exhibit MEC ~10(1)-10(2) g/m(3), comparable to the MEC for coals and for fine particle carbon blacks and graphites. The nanocarbons are confirmed mainly to be in the St-1 explosion class, with fullerene, at K(St) ~200 bar-m/s, borderline St-1/St-2. We estimate MIE ~ 10(2)-10(3) J, an order of magnitude higher than the MIE for coals but an order of magnitude lower than the MIE for fine particle graphites. While the explosion severity of the nanocarbons is comparable to that of the coals, their explosion susceptibility (ease of ignition) is significantly less (i.e., the nanocarbons have higher MIEs than do the coals); by contrast, the nanocarbons exhibit similar explosion severity to the graphites but enhanced explosion susceptibility (i.e., the nanocarbons have lower MIEs than do the graphites). MIT(cloud) > 550 °C, comparable to that of the coals and carbon blacks.

Citing Articles

Properties of residual titanium dioxide nanoparticles after extended periods of mixing and settling in synthetic and natural waters.

Zhang C, Lohwacharin J, Takizawa S Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):9943.

PMID: 28855538 PMC: 5577155. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-09699-9.


Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of the Venturi Dustiness Tester.

Dubey P, Ghia U, Turkevich L Powder Technol. 2017; 312:310-320.

PMID: 28638167 PMC: 5476224. DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2017.02.030.


Use of a modified GreenScreen tool to conduct a screening-level comparative hazard assessment of conventional silver and two forms of nanosilver.

Sass J, Heine L, Hwang N Environ Health. 2016; 15(1):105.

PMID: 27825359 PMC: 5101654. DOI: 10.1186/s12940-016-0188-y.


Potential Explosion Hazard of Carbonaceous Nanoparticles: Screening of Allotropes.

Turkevich L, Fernback J, Dastidar A, Osterberg P Combust Flame. 2016; 167:218-227.

PMID: 27468178 PMC: 4959120. DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2016.02.010.


Perspectives on the design of safer nanomaterials and manufacturing processes.

Geraci C, Heidel D, Sayes C, Hodson L, Schulte P, Eastlake A J Nanopart Res. 2015; 17(9):366.

PMID: 26435688 PMC: 4589526. DOI: 10.1007/s11051-015-3152-9.

References
1.
Randeberg E, Eckhoff R . Measurement of minimum ignition energies of dust clouds in the <1mJ region. J Hazard Mater. 2006; 140(1-2):237-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.06.102. View

2.
Bouillard J, Vignes A, Dufaud O, Perrin L, Thomas D . Ignition and explosion risks of nanopowders. J Hazard Mater. 2010; 181(1-3):873-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.05.094. View

3.
Cornillault J . Particle size analyzer. Appl Opt. 2010; 11(2):265. DOI: 10.1364/AO.11.000265. View