» Articles » PMID: 25912892

Parallel Language Activation and Inhibitory Control in Bimodal Bilinguals

Overview
Journal Cognition
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Psychology
Date 2015 Apr 28
PMID 25912892
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Findings from recent studies suggest that spoken-language bilinguals engage nonlinguistic inhibitory control mechanisms to resolve cross-linguistic competition during auditory word recognition. Bilingual advantages in inhibitory control might stem from the need to resolve perceptual competition between similar-sounding words both within and between their two languages. If so, these advantages should be lessened or eliminated when there is no perceptual competition between two languages. The present study investigated the extent of inhibitory control recruitment during bilingual language comprehension by examining associations between language co-activation and nonlinguistic inhibitory control abilities in bimodal bilinguals, whose two languages do not perceptually compete. Cross-linguistic distractor activation was identified in the visual world paradigm, and correlated significantly with performance on a nonlinguistic spatial Stroop task within a group of 27 hearing ASL-English bilinguals. Smaller Stroop effects (indexing more efficient inhibition) were associated with reduced co-activation of ASL signs during the early stages of auditory word recognition. These results suggest that inhibitory control in auditory word recognition is not limited to resolving perceptual linguistic competition in phonological input, but is also used to moderate competition that originates at the lexico-semantic level.

Citing Articles

An eye-movement database of bilingual language control for Chinese-English bilinguals.

Wang T, Wang Y, Hu H, Wang X, Chen S, Yang Y Sci Data. 2025; 12(1):332.

PMID: 40000665 PMC: 11861911. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-025-04628-2.


Functional characterization of the language network of polyglots and hyperpolyglots with precision fMRI.

Malik-Moraleda S, Jouravlev O, Taliaferro M, Mineroff Z, Cucu T, Mahowald K Cereb Cortex. 2024; 34(3).

PMID: 38466812 PMC: 10928488. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhae049.


Lessons to be Learned from Bimodal Bilingualism.

Lillo-Martin D, Gagne D, Pichler D Hrvat Rev Rehabil Istraž. 2023; 58(Spec Issue):83-97.

PMID: 37396567 PMC: 10311567. DOI: 10.31299/hrri.58.si.4.


Functional characterization of the language network of polyglots and hyperpolyglots with precision fMRI.

Malik-Moraleda S, Jouravlev O, Taliaferro M, Mineroff Z, Cucu T, Mahowald K bioRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 36711949 PMC: 9882290. DOI: 10.1101/2023.01.19.524657.


Visual word recognition in bilinguals: Eye-tracking evidence that L2 proficiency impacts access of L1 phonotactics.

Freeman M, Marian V Stud Second Lang Acquis. 2022; 44(3):759-787.

PMID: 36081612 PMC: 9450561. DOI: 10.1017/S027226312100053X.


References
1.
Costa A, Strijkers K, Martin C, Thierry G . The time course of word retrieval revealed by event-related brain potentials during overt speech. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(50):21442-6. PMC: 2795564. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0908921106. View

2.
Macnamara B, Conway A . Novel evidence in support of the bilingual advantage: influences of task demands and experience on cognitive control and working memory. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013; 21(2):520-5. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0524-y. View

3.
Abutalebi J . Neural aspects of second language representation and language control. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008; 128(3):466-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.03.014. View

4.
Shook A, Marian V . The Bilingual Language Interaction Network for Comprehension of Speech. Biling (Camb Engl). 2013; 16(2). PMC: 3866103. DOI: 10.1017/S1366728912000466. View

5.
Marian V, Blumenfeld H, Boukrina O . Sensitivity to phonological similarity within and across languages. J Psycholinguist Res. 2007; 37(3):141-70. PMC: 2788498. DOI: 10.1007/s10936-007-9064-9. View