» Articles » PMID: 25912639

Augmentation of Failed Human Vertebrae with Critical Un-contained Lytic Defect Restores Their Structural Competence Under Functional Loading: An Experimental Study

Overview
Date 2015 Apr 28
PMID 25912639
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Lytic spinal lesions reduce vertebral strength and may result in their fracture. Vertebral augmentation is employed clinically to provide mechanical stability and pain relief for vertebrae with lytic lesions. However, little is known about its efficacy in strengthening fractured vertebrae containing lytic metastasis.

Methods: Eighteen unembalmed human lumbar vertebrae, having simulated uncontained lytic defects and tested to failure in a prior study, were augmented using a transpedicular approach and re-tested to failure using a wedge fracture model. Axial and moment based strength and stiffness parameters were used to quantify the effect of augmentation on the structural response of the failed vertebrae. Effects of cement volume, bone mineral density and vertebral geometry on the change in structural response were investigated.

Findings: Augmentation increased the failed lytic vertebral strength [compression: 85% (P<0.001), flexion: 80% (P<0.001), anterior-posterior shear: 95%, P<0.001)] and stiffness [(40% (P<0.05), 53% (P<0.05), 45% (P<0.05)]. Cement volume correlated with the compressive strength (r(2)=0.47, P<0.05) and anterior-posterior shear strength (r(2)=0.52, P<0.05) and stiffness (r(2)=0.45, P<0.05). Neither the geometry of the failed vertebrae nor its pre-fracture bone mineral density correlated with the volume of cement.

Interpretation: Vertebral augmentation is effective in bolstering the failed lytic vertebrae compressive and axial structural competence, showing strength estimates up to 50-90% of historical values of osteoporotic vertebrae without lytic defects. This modest increase suggests that lytic vertebrae undergo a high degree of structural damage at failure, with strength only partially restored by vertebral augmentation. The positive effect of cement volume is self-limiting due to extravasation.

Citing Articles

Assessing the Mechanical Weakness of Vertebrae Affected by Primary Tumors: A Feasibility Study.

Palanca M, Cristofolini L, Gasbarrini A, Tedesco G, Barbanti-Brodano G Materials (Basel). 2020; 13(15).

PMID: 32707909 PMC: 7435846. DOI: 10.3390/ma13153256.

References
1.
Lewiecki E . Clinical applications of bone density testing for osteoporosis. Minerva Med. 2005; 96(5):317-30. View

2.
Harel R, Angelov L . Spine metastases: current treatments and future directions. Eur J Cancer. 2010; 46(15):2696-707. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.04.025. View

3.
Dublin A, Hartman J, Latchaw R, Hald J, Reid M . The vertebral body fracture in osteoporosis: restoration of height using percutaneous vertebroplasty. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005; 26(3):489-92. PMC: 7976481. View

4.
Hussein A, Mason Z, Morgan E . Presence of intervertebral discs alters observed stiffness and failure mechanisms in the vertebra. J Biomech. 2013; 46(10):1683-8. PMC: 3733079. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.04.004. View

5.
Gangi A, Kastler B, Dietemann J . Percutaneous vertebroplasty guided by a combination of CT and fluoroscopy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1994; 15(1):83-6. PMC: 8332094. View