» Articles » PMID: 25912184

Important Tips and Numbers on Using the Cortical Step and Diameter Difference Sign in Assessing Femoral Rotation--should We Abandon the Technique?

Overview
Journal Injury
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2015 Apr 28
PMID 25912184
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rotational malalignment during femoral nailing is common despite having various intraoperative assessment methods. The cortical step sign and diameter difference sign (CSSDDS) is commonly used because of convenience, yet it lack proper scientific scrutiny and is thought to be error prone. Using a software algorithm, cross-sectional dimensions were obtained from CT scans of 22 intact adult femurs at the proximal, mid and distal diaphysis. With multiple simulated scenarios the sensitivity of CSSDDS was comprehensively determined at all possible C-arm positions. At rotation, cortical width changed most significantly around the thick linea aspera and femoral diameter changed most significantly at the sagittal plane. At 15 degrees of rotation and with the linea aspera in view, CSSDDS thresholds of 0.3mm, 0.6mm and 1mm had sensitivities of 98.8%, 93.1% and 73.8%. With the linea aspera masked behind the femur and out of view, the sensitivities significantly deteriorated to 96.4%, 77.1% and 44.1% respectively. CSSDDS is sufficiently sensitive only when strict rules are followed. It is imperative that the operator position the image intensifier in lateral view under proper magnification so that steps of less than 0.6mm around the linea aspera may be appreciated.

Citing Articles

Minimally Invasive Derotational Osteotomy of Long Bones: Smartphone Application Used to Improve the Accuracy of Correction.

Oh C, Park K, Kim J, Kim D, Seo I, Lee J J Clin Med. 2023; 12(4).

PMID: 36835871 PMC: 9965314. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12041335.


Radiographic cortical thickness parameters as predictors of rotational alignment in proximal tibial shaft fractures: a cadaveric study.

Keppler A, Kussner K, Schulze A, Suero E, Neuerburg C, Weigert M BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22(1):590.

PMID: 34174846 PMC: 8236139. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04452-w.


Sensitivity of low-frequency axial transmission acoustics to axially and azimuthally varying cortical thickness: A phantom-based study.

Vogl F, Patil M, Taylor W PLoS One. 2019; 14(7):e0219360.

PMID: 31314773 PMC: 6636721. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219360.