» Articles » PMID: 25912073

Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Reducing Anterior Tibial Subluxation

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2015 Apr 28
PMID 25912073
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To measure and compare the amount of anterior tibial subluxation (ATS) after anatomic ACL reconstruction for both acute and chronic ACL-deficient patients.

Methods: Fifty-two patients were clinically and radiographically evaluated after primary, unilateral, anatomic ACL reconstruction. Post-operative true lateral radiographs were obtained of both knees with the patient in supine position and knees in full passive extension with heels on a standardized bolster. ATS was measured on the radiographs by two independent and blinded observers. ATS was calculated as the side-to-side difference in tibial position relative to the femur. An independent t test was used to compare ATS between those undergoing anatomic reconstruction for an acute versus chronic ACL injury. Chronic ACL deficiency was defined as more than 12 weeks from injury to surgery.

Results: Patients averaged 26.4 ± 11.5 years (mean ± SD) of age, 43.6 % were female, and 48.1 % suffered an injury of the left knee. There were 30 and 22 patients in the acute and chronic groups, respectively. The median duration from injury to reconstruction for the acute group was 5 versus 31 weeks for the chronic group. After anatomic ACL reconstruction, the mean ATS was 1.0 ± 2.1 mm. There was no statistical difference in ATS between the acute and chronic groups (1.2 ± 2.0 vs. 0.6 ± 2.3 mm, n.s.). Assessment of inter-tester reliability for radiographic evaluation of ATS revealed an excellent intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.894.

Conclusions: Anatomic ACL reconstruction reduces ATS with a mean difference of 1.0 mm from the healthy contralateral limb. This study did not find a statistical difference in ATS between patients after anatomic ACL reconstruction in the acute or chronic phase. These observations suggest that anatomic ACL reconstruction, performed in either the acute or the chronic phase, approaches the normal AP relationship of the tibiofemoral joint.

Level Of Evidence: IV.

Citing Articles

Temporal changes in tibiofemoral relationship following anterior cruciate ligament injury: Implications for rotational dynamics and clinical outcomes.

Okimura S, Suzuki T, Ikeda Y, Shiwaku K, Hamaoka K, Horita K J Exp Orthop. 2024; 11(3):e70014.

PMID: 39253541 PMC: 11382131. DOI: 10.1002/jeo2.70014.


Radiographic assessment of the tibiofemoral relationship in anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees.

Kim S, Kobayashi K, Uchino S, Nozawa M J Orthop. 2021; 23:256-258.

PMID: 33642820 PMC: 7895669. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.02.004.


Sequential analysis of three-dimensional tibiofemoral relationship through anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with gravity-assisted radiographic technique in prone position.

Tachibana Y, Mae T, Shino K, Matsuo T, Sugamoto K, Yoshikawa H Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2019; 18:11-17.

PMID: 31641617 PMC: 6796590. DOI: 10.1016/j.asmart.2019.08.001.


Chronicity of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency, Part 2: Radiographic Predictors of Early Graft Failure.

Tanaka Y, Kita K, Takao R, Amano H, Uchida R, Shiozaki Y Orthop J Sports Med. 2018; 6(2):2325967117751915.

PMID: 29479543 PMC: 5818097. DOI: 10.1177/2325967117751915.


Chronicity of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency, Part 1: Effects on the Tibiofemoral Relationship Before and Immediately After Anatomic ACL Reconstruction With Autologous Hamstring Grafts.

Tanaka Y, Kita K, Takao R, Amano H, Uchida R, Shiozaki Y Orthop J Sports Med. 2018; 6(1):2325967117750813.

PMID: 29383322 PMC: 5784495. DOI: 10.1177/2325967117750813.


References
1.
Almekinders L, DE CASTRO D . Fixed tibial subluxation after successful anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2001; 29(3):280-3. DOI: 10.1177/03635465010290030301. View

2.
Almekinders L, Chiavetta J . Tibial subluxation in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees: Implications for tibial tunnel placement. Arthroscopy. 2001; 17(9):960-2. DOI: 10.1053/jars.2001.25248. View

3.
Almekinders L, Chiavetta J, Clarke J . Radiographic evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament graft failure with special reference to tibial tunnel placement. Arthroscopy. 1998; 14(2):206-11. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-8063(98)70042-8. View

4.
Almekinders L, Pandarinath R, Rahusen F . Knee stability following anterior cruciate ligament rupture and surgery. The contribution of irreducible tibial subluxation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86(5):983-7. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200405000-00014. View

5.
Forsythe B, Kopf S, Wong A, Martins C, Anderst W, Tashman S . The location of femoral and tibial tunnels in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction analyzed by three-dimensional computed tomography models. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92(6):1418-26. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00654. View