[Bone Defect Adjusted Strategy in Revision Arthroplasty of the Hip : Wich Implant in Wich Situation? Innovations and Approved Methods]

Overview

Journal Orthopade

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2015 Apr 26

PMID 25911603

Citations 1

Authors

B S Craiovan

J Grifka

A Keshmiri

B Moser

M Worner

T Renkawitz

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Revision total hip arthroplasty is of rising importance, with 35,000 procedures a year in Germany.

Objectives: Primary stability of the revision implant, reconstruction of the anatomical hip center, reconstruction of bone stock, and permanent secondary integration are the main priorities.

Methods: Current literature and examples from our own experience are presented.

Results And Conclusions: Novel developments from basic research and industrial partners extend the possibilities for treating affected patients. For an integrated therapy concept in implant selection criteria, such as situation and structure of the defect, combination with any remaining implants, causes of loosening and failure, implant allergy, and patient-specific parameters should be taken into consideration.

Citing Articles

Soft tissue restricts impingement-free mobility in total hip arthroplasty.

Woerner M, Weber M, Sendtner E, Springorum R, Worlicek M, Craiovan B Int Orthop. 2016; 41(2):277-282.

PMID: 27150487 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-016-3216-1.

References

DAntonio J, Capello W, Borden L, Bargar W, Bierbaum B, Boettcher W . Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989; (243):126-37. View

Renkawitz T, Haimerl M, Dohmen L, Gneiting S, Wegner M, Ehret N . Minimally invasive computer-navigated total hip arthroplasty, following the concept of femur first and combined anteversion: design of a blinded randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011; 12:192. PMC: 3180441. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-192. View

Hoshino M, Namikawa T, Kato M, Terai H, Taguchi S, Takaoka K . Repair of bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty by implantation of a new bone-inducing material comprised of recombinant human BMP-2, Beta-TCP powder, and a biodegradable polymer: an experimental study in dogs. J Orthop Res. 2007; 25(8):1042-51. DOI: 10.1002/jor.20424. View

Shanbhag A, Jacobs J, Black J, Galante J, Glant T . Macrophage/particle interactions: effect of size, composition and surface area. J Biomed Mater Res. 1994; 28(1):81-90. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820280111. View

Schmolders J, Friedrich M, Michel R, Randau T, Wimmer M, Strauss A . Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty with a modular revision system and biological defect augmentation. Int Orthop. 2014; 39(4):623-30. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2533-5. View

Charissoux J, Asloum Y, Marcheix P . Surgical management of recurrent dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014; 100(1 Suppl):S25-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.11.008. View

Baumann B, Rolf O, Jakob F, Goebel S, Sterner T, Eulert J . Synergistic effects of mixed TiAlV and polyethylene wear particles on TNFalpha response in THP-1 macrophages. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2006; 51(5-6):360-6. DOI: 10.1515/BMT.2006.070. View

Gravius S, Randau T, Wirtz D . [What can be done when hip prostheses fail? : New trends in revision endoprosthetics]. Orthopade. 2011; 40(12):1084-94. DOI: 10.1007/s00132-011-1844-0. View

Krenn V, Morawietz L, Perino G, Kienapfel H, Ascherl R, Hassenpflug G . Revised histopathological consensus classification of joint implant related pathology. Pathol Res Pract. 2014; 210(12):779-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2014.09.017. View

10.

DANTONIO J, McCarthy J, Bargar W, Borden L, Cappelo W, Collis D . Classification of femoral abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993; (296):133-9. View

11.

Schuh A, Werber S, Holzwarth U, Zeiler G . Cementless modular hip revision arthroplasty using the MRP Titan Revision Stem: outcome of 79 hips after an average of 4 years' follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004; 124(5):306-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-004-0656-7. View

12.

Lehner B, Witte D, Suda A, Weiss S . [Revision strategy for periprosthetic infection]. Orthopade. 2009; 38(8):681-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00132-009-1434-6. View

13.

Bettin D, Katthagen B . [The German Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology classification of bone defects in total hip endoprostheses revision operations]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1997; 135(4):281-4. DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1039389. View

14.

Swarts E, Bucher T, Phillips M, Yap F . Does the ingrowth surface make a difference? A retrieval study of 423 cementless acetabular components. J Arthroplasty. 2014; 30(4):706-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.10.028. View

15.

Holzapfel B, Greimel F, Prodinger P, Pilge H, Noth U, Gollwitzer H . Total hip replacement in developmental dysplasia using an oval-shaped cementless press-fit cup. Int Orthop. 2012; 36(7):1355-61. PMC: 3385904. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-012-1510-0. View

16.

Gruner A, Heller K . [Revision hip arthroplastiy of the hip joint. Revision of the femur: which implant is indicated when?]. Orthopade. 2009; 38(8):667-80. DOI: 10.1007/s00132-009-1430-x. View

17.

Issack P, Nousiainen M, Beksac B, Helfet D, Sculco T, Buly R . Acetabular component revision in total hip arthroplasty. Part II: management of major bone loss and pelvic discontinuity. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2010; 38(11):550-6. View

18.

Schaumburger J, Winkler S, Handel M, Grifka J, Baier C . [Prosthesis loosening]. Z Rheumatol. 2012; 71(9):785-97. DOI: 10.1007/s00393-012-1042-4. View

19.

Guyen O, Pibarot V, Vaz G, Chevillotte C, Bejui-Hugues J . Use of a dual mobility socket to manage total hip arthroplasty instability. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 467(2):465-72. PMC: 2628522. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0476-0. View

20.

Mumme T, Muller-Rath R, Andereya S, Wirtz D . Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2007; 19(1):56-77. DOI: 10.1007/s00064-007-1195-5. View