Case-Based FMRI Analysis After Cognitive Rehabilitation in MS: A Novel Approach

Overview

Journal Front Neurol

Specialty Neurology

Date 2015 Apr 24

PMID 25904893

Citations 9

Authors

Martina Hubacher

Ludwig Kappos

Katrin Weier

Markus Stocklin

Klaus Opwis

Iris-Katharina Penner

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Cognitive decline in multiple sclerosis (MS) negatively impacts patients' everyday functioning and quality of life. Since symptomatic pharmacological treatment is not yet available alternative treatment strategies such as cognitive rehabilitation are of particular interest.

Objectives: To analyse the ways in which MS patients respond to cognitive training, by combining behavioral and fMRI data in a case-based triangulation approach.

Methods: Ten relapsing-remitting (RR) MS patients aged between 39 and 58 years and between 1 and 8 years post MS diagnosis were included. EDSS ranged from 1 to 3.5. Participants had normal to high intelligence levels. Six patients were assigned to the training group (TG) and four to the control group (CG) without intervention. The TG received a 4-week computerized working memory (WM) training, consisting of 16 training sessions of 45 min duration each. Before and after the training a neuropsychological examination and fMRI investigation by using an N-back task of different complexity was applied.

Results: Patients in the TG responded differently to cognitive training. Four participants did not meet the triangulation criteria for being treatment responders. The two responders showed two distinct changes regarding activation patterns after training: (I) decreased brain activation associated with increased processing speed and (II) increased brain activation associated with higher processing speed and WM performance.

Conclusion: The occurrence of different and opposed response patterns after the same training indicates a risk in applying classical group statistics. Different and especially opposed patterns within the same sample may distort results of classical statistical comparisons. Thus, underlying processes may not be discovered and lead to misinterpretation of results.

Citing Articles

Virtual reality for multiple sclerosis rehabilitation.

De Keersmaecker E, Guida S, Denissen S, Dewolf L, Nagels G, Jansen B Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025; 1:CD013834.

PMID: 39775922 PMC: 11705534. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013834.pub2.

Pre-training working memory/information processing capabilities and brain atrophy limit the improving effects of cognitive training.

Esbri S, Sebastian Tirado A, Zaragoza Mezquita M, Sanchis Segura C, Forn C Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2023; 9(3):20552173231196990.

PMID: 37692294 PMC: 10483983. DOI: 10.1177/20552173231196990.

Is mHealth a Useful Tool for Self-Assessment and Rehabilitation of People with Multiple Sclerosis? A Systematic Review.

Bonnechere B, Rintala A, Spooren A, Lamers I, Feys P Brain Sci. 2021; 11(9).

PMID: 34573208 PMC: 8466296. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11091187.

Neural Correlates of Food Cue Exposure Intervention for Obesity: A Case-Series Approach.

Franssen S, Jansen A, Schyns G, van den Akker K, Roefs A Front Behav Neurosci. 2020; 14:46.

PMID: 32372924 PMC: 7187770. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2020.00046.

Treatment and management of cognitive dysfunction in patients with multiple sclerosis.

DeLuca J, Chiaravalloti N, Sandroff B Nat Rev Neurol. 2020; 16(6):319-332.

PMID: 32372033 DOI: 10.1038/s41582-020-0355-1.

References

Wexler B, Anderson M, Fulbright R, Gore J . Preliminary evidence of improved verbal working memory performance and normalization of task-related frontal lobe activation in schizophrenia following cognitive exercises. Am J Psychiatry. 2000; 157(10):1694-7. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.10.1694. View

Cerasa A, Gioia M, Valentino P, Nistico R, Chiriaco C, Pirritano D . Computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation of attention deficits for multiple sclerosis: a randomized trial with fMRI correlates. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012; 27(4):284-95. DOI: 10.1177/1545968312465194. View

Landau S, Garavan H, Schumacher E, DEsposito M . Regional specificity and practice: dynamic changes in object and spatial working memory. Brain Res. 2007; 1180:78-89. PMC: 2100391. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.08.057. View

Sayala S, Sala J, Courtney S . Increased neural efficiency with repeated performance of a working memory task is information-type dependent. Cereb Cortex. 2005; 16(5):609-17. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhj007. View

Moore C, Cohen M, Ranganath C . Neural mechanisms of expert skills in visual working memory. J Neurosci. 2006; 26(43):11187-96. PMC: 6674656. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1873-06.2006. View

Mattioli F, Stampatori C, Bellomi F, Capra R, Rocca M, Filippi M . Neuropsychological rehabilitation in adult multiple sclerosis. Neurol Sci. 2010; 31(Suppl 2):S271-4. DOI: 10.1007/s10072-010-0373-7. View

das Nair R, Ferguson H, Stark D, Lincoln N . Memory Rehabilitation for people with multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; (3):CD008754. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008754.pub2. View

Vogt A, Kappos L, Calabrese P, Stocklin M, Gschwind L, Opwis K . Working memory training in patients with multiple sclerosis - comparison of two different training schedules. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2009; 27(3):225-35. DOI: 10.3233/RNN-2009-0473. View

Penner I, Kappos L, Rausch M, Opwis K, Radu E . Therapy-induced plasticity of cognitive functions in MS patients: insights from fMRI. J Physiol Paris. 2006; 99(4-6):455-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.03.008. View

10.

Jansma J, Ramsey N, Slagter H, Kahn R . Functional anatomical correlates of controlled and automatic processing. J Cogn Neurosci. 2001; 13(6):730-43. DOI: 10.1162/08989290152541403. View

11.

Lieberman M, Cunningham W . Type I and Type II error concerns in fMRI research: re-balancing the scale. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2009; 4(4):423-8. PMC: 2799956. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsp052. View

12.

Buschkuehl M, Jaeggi S, Jonides J . Neuronal effects following working memory training. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2012; 2 Suppl 1:S167-79. PMC: 6987667. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2011.10.001. View

13.

Penner I, Raselli C, Stocklin M, Opwis K, Kappos L, Calabrese P . The Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Functions (FSMC): validation of a new instrument to assess multiple sclerosis-related fatigue. Mult Scler. 2009; 15(12):1509-17. DOI: 10.1177/1352458509348519. View

14.

Ernst A, Botzung A, Gounot D, Sellal F, Blanc F, De Seze J . Induced brain plasticity after a facilitation programme for autobiographical memory in multiple sclerosis: a preliminary study. Mult Scler Int. 2012; 2012:820240. PMC: 3483777. DOI: 10.1155/2012/820240. View

15.

Jolles D, Grol M, van Buchem M, Rombouts S, Crone E . Practice effects in the brain: Changes in cerebral activation after working memory practice depend on task demands. Neuroimage. 2010; 52(2):658-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.028. View

16.

Schmidt P, Gaser C, Arsic M, Buck D, Forschler A, Berthele A . An automated tool for detection of FLAIR-hyperintense white-matter lesions in Multiple Sclerosis. Neuroimage. 2011; 59(4):3774-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.032. View

17.

Kelly C, Foxe J, Garavan H . Patterns of normal human brain plasticity after practice and their implications for neurorehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006; 87(12 Suppl 2):S20-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.08.333. View

18.

Dahlin E, Nyberg L, Backman L, Neely A . Plasticity of executive functioning in young and older adults: immediate training gains, transfer, and long-term maintenance. Psychol Aging. 2009; 23(4):720-30. DOI: 10.1037/a0014296. View

19.

Sastre-Garriga J, Alonso J, Renom M, Arevalo M, Gonzalez I, Galan I . A functional magnetic resonance proof of concept pilot trial of cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2010; 17(4):457-67. DOI: 10.1177/1352458510389219. View

20.

Ashburner J . A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. Neuroimage. 2007; 38(1):95-113. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.007. View