» Articles » PMID: 25903929

Developing a Clinical Pathway for the Identification and Management of Anxiety and Depression in Adult Cancer Patients: an Online Delphi Consensus Process

Overview
Specialties Critical Care
Oncology
Date 2015 Apr 24
PMID 25903929
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: People with cancer and their families experience high levels of psychological morbidity. However, many cancer services do not routinely screen patients for anxiety and depression, and there are no standardized clinical referral pathways. This study aimed to establish consensus on elements of a draft clinical pathway tailored to the Australian context.

Methods: A two-round Delphi study was conducted to gain consensus among Australian oncology and psycho-oncology clinicians about the validity of 39 items that form the basis of a clinical pathway that includes screening, assessment, referral and stepped care management of anxiety and depression in the context of cancer. The expert panel comprised 87 multidisciplinary clinician members of the Australian Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG). Respondents rated their level of agreement with each statement on a 5-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined as >80% of respondents scoring within 2 points on the Likert scale.

Results: Consensus was reached for 21 of 39 items, and a further 15 items approached consensus except for specific contextual factors, after two Delphi rounds. Formal screening for anxiety and depression, a stepped care model of management and recommendations for inclusion of length of treatment and time to review were endorsed. Consensus was not reached on items related to roles and responsibilities, particularly those not applicable across cancer settings.

Conclusions: This study identified a core set of evidence- and consensus-based principles considered essential to a stepped care model of care incorporating identification, referral and management of anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients.

Citing Articles

Fidelity and acceptability of implementation strategies developed for adherence to a clinical pathway for screening, assessment and management of anxiety and depression in adults with cancer.

He S, Shepherd H, Butow P, Shaw J, Harris M, Faris M Arch Public Health. 2024; 82(1):65.

PMID: 38711115 PMC: 11071180. DOI: 10.1186/s13690-024-01293-6.


Perceptions and Current Practices in Patient-Centered Care: A Qualitative Study of Ryan White HIV Providers in South Florida.

Knight J, Ward M, Fernandez S, Genberg B, Beach M, Ladner R J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2024; 23:23259582241244684.

PMID: 38651291 PMC: 11036924. DOI: 10.1177/23259582241244684.


Identification of an oncological clinical pathway through questionnaires to health professionals.

Forrester M, Breitenfeld L, Castelo-Branco M, Aperta J BMC Health Serv Res. 2023; 23(1):1011.

PMID: 37726812 PMC: 10510255. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09964-w.


Effect of core versus enhanced implementation strategies on adherence to a clinical pathway for managing anxiety and depression in cancer patients in routine care: a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Butow P, Faris M, Shaw J, Kelly P, He S, Harris M Implement Sci. 2023; 18(1):18.

PMID: 37217928 PMC: 10204284. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-023-01269-0.


Towards a novel approach guiding the decision-making process for anticancer treatment in patients with advanced cancer: framework for systemic anticancer treatment with palliative intent.

Ribi K, Kalbermatten N, Eicher M, Strasser F ESMO Open. 2022; 7(3):100496.

PMID: 35597176 PMC: 9271509. DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100496.


References
1.
Mitchell A, Kaar S, Coggan C, Herdman J . Acceptability of common screening methods used to detect distress and related mood disorders-preferences of cancer specialists and non-specialists. Psychooncology. 2007; 17(3):226-36. DOI: 10.1002/pon.1228. View

2.
Akins R, Tolson H, Cole B . Stability of response characteristics of a Delphi panel: application of bootstrap data expansion. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005; 5:37. PMC: 1318466. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-37. View

3.
Dudgeon D, King S, Howell D, Green E, Gilbert J, Hughes E . Cancer Care Ontario's experience with implementation of routine physical and psychological symptom distress screening. Psychooncology. 2011; 21(4):357-64. DOI: 10.1002/pon.1918. View

4.
Newell S, Sanson-Fisher R, Girgis A, Bonaventura A . How well do medical oncologists' perceptions reflect their patients' reported physical and psychosocial problems? Data from a survey of five oncologists. Cancer. 1998; 83(8):1640-51. View

5.
Loscalzo M, Clark K, Holland J . Successful strategies for implementing biopsychosocial screening. Psychooncology. 2011; 20(5):455-62. DOI: 10.1002/pon.1930. View