» Articles » PMID: 25901309

Simple Versus Complex Models of Trait Evolution and Stasis As a Response to Environmental Change

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2015 Apr 23
PMID 25901309
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous analyses of evolutionary patterns, or modes, in fossil lineages have focused overwhelmingly on three simple models: stasis, random walks, and directional evolution. Here we use likelihood methods to fit an expanded set of evolutionary models to a large compilation of ancestor-descendant series of populations from the fossil record. In addition to the standard three models, we assess more complex models with punctuations and shifts from one evolutionary mode to another. As in previous studies, we find that stasis is common in the fossil record, as is a strict version of stasis that entails no real evolutionary changes. Incidence of directional evolution is relatively low (13%), but higher than in previous studies because our analytical approach can more sensitively detect noisy trends. Complex evolutionary models are often favored, overwhelmingly so for sequences comprising many samples. This finding is consistent with evolutionary dynamics that are, in reality, more complex than any of the models we consider. Furthermore, the timing of shifts in evolutionary dynamics varies among traits measured from the same series. Finally, we use our empirical collection of evolutionary sequences and a long and highly resolved proxy for global climate to inform simulations in which traits adaptively track temperature changes over time. When realistically calibrated, we find that this simple model can reproduce important aspects of our paleontological results. We conclude that observed paleontological patterns, including the prevalence of stasis, need not be inconsistent with adaptive evolution, even in the face of unstable physical environments.

Citing Articles

Leveraging Comparative Phylogenetics for Evolutionary Medicine: Applications to Comparative Oncology.

Mellon W, Sterner B, Agren J, Vincze O, Marx M, Kapsetaki S bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39990350 PMC: 11844554. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.11.637459.


Identification of the mode of evolution in incomplete carbonate successions.

Hohmann N, Koelewijn J, Burgess P, Jarochowska E BMC Ecol Evol. 2024; 24(1):113.

PMID: 39180003 PMC: 11342597. DOI: 10.1186/s12862-024-02287-2.


RRmorph-a new R package to map phenotypic evolutionary rates and patterns on 3D meshes.

Melchionna M, Castiglione S, Girardi G, Serio C, Esposito A, Mondanaro A Commun Biol. 2024; 7(1):1009.

PMID: 39154087 PMC: 11330470. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-06710-8.


Fitting and evaluating univariate and multivariate models of within-lineage evolution.

Voje K Paleobiology. 2023; 49(4):747-764.

PMID: 37859727 PMC: 7615219. DOI: 10.1017/pab.2023.10.


How we study cryptic species and their biological implications: A case study from marine shelled gastropods.

Shin C, Allmon W Ecol Evol. 2023; 13(9):e10360.

PMID: 37680961 PMC: 10480071. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10360.


References
1.
Jackson , Cheetham . Tempo and mode of speciation in the sea. Trends Ecol Evol. 1999; 14(2):72-77. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01504-3. View

2.
Sheets H, Mitchell C . Why the null matters: statistical tests, random walks and evolution. Genetica. 2002; 112-113:105-25. View

3.
Hunt G, Roy K . Climate change, body size evolution, and Cope's Rule in deep-sea ostracodes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(5):1347-52. PMC: 1360587. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0510550103. View

4.
Estes S, Arnold S . Resolving the paradox of stasis: models with stabilizing selection explain evolutionary divergence on all timescales. Am Nat. 2007; 169(2):227-44. DOI: 10.1086/510633. View

5.
Hunt G . The relative importance of directional change, random walks, and stasis in the evolution of fossil lineages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(47):18404-8. PMC: 2141789. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0704088104. View