» Articles » PMID: 25901022

Safe and Effective Use of the Once Weekly Dulaglutide Single-Dose Pen in Injection-Naïve Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2015 Apr 23
PMID 25901022
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This 4-week, phase 3b, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, outpatient study demonstrated the safe and effective use of the dulaglutide single-dose pen containing 0.5 mL of placebo for subcutaneous injection in injection-naïve adult patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), with A1C ≤ 8.5% (69 mmol/mol), BMI ≥ 23 kg/m2 and ≤ 45 kg/m(2).

Method: Patients completed a modified self-injecting subscale of the Diabetes Fear of Injecting and Self-Testing Questionnaire (mD-FISQ) and were trained to self-inject with the single-dose pen. Patients completed the initial self-injection at the site, injected at home for 2 subsequent weeks, and returned to the site for the final injection. The initial and final self-injections were evaluated for success; the final (initial) self-injection success rate was the primary (secondary) outcome measure, and the primary (secondary) objective was to demonstrate this success rate as being significantly greater than 80%. Patients recorded their level of pain after each injection. After the final injection, patients completed the mD-FISQ and the Medication Delivery Device Assessment Battery (MDDAB) to assess their perceptions of the single-dose pen, including ease of use and experience with the device.

Results: Among 211 patients (mean age: 61 years), the primary objective was met, with a final injection success rate of 99.1% (95% CI: 96.6% to 99.7%). Among 214 patients, the initial injection success rate was 97.2% (95% CI: 94.0% to 98.7%), meeting the key secondary objective. Overall, most patients (>96%) found the device easy to use, were satisfied with the device, and would be willing to continue to use the single-dose pen after the study. There was a significant reduction (P < .001) from baseline to study end in patients' fear of self-injecting, as measured by the mD-FISQ.

Conclusions: The dulaglutide single-dose pen was found to be a safe and effective device for use by patients with T2D who were injection-naïve. A positive injection experience is an important factor for patients and providers when initiating injectable therapy.

Citing Articles

Development of a Measure to Assess Attitudes Towards Nasal versus Autoinjector Glucagon Delivery Devices for Treatment of Severe Hypoglycemia.

Bajpai S, Cambron-Mellott M, Will O, Poon J, Wang Q, Mitchell B Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2022; 15:3601-3615.

PMID: 36439296 PMC: 9694976. DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S367010.


Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Use in People Living with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Narrative Review of the Key Evidence with Practical Considerations.

Gorriz J, Romera I, Cobo A, OBrien P, Merino-Torres J Diabetes Ther. 2022; 13(3):389-421.

PMID: 35175551 PMC: 8934828. DOI: 10.1007/s13300-021-01198-5.


Semaglutide single-dose pen-injector: Post hoc analysis of summative usability testing for weight management.

Klonoff D, Bassock S, Engels E, Frederiksen M, Marber M, Qvist M Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021; 23(11):2590-2594.

PMID: 34338402 PMC: 9292194. DOI: 10.1111/dom.14509.


Patient Perceptions of and Preferences Between Characteristics of Injectable Diabetes Treatments.

Boye K, Jordan J, Malik R, Currie B, Matza L Diabetes Ther. 2021; 12(9):2387-2403.

PMID: 34297341 PMC: 8385031. DOI: 10.1007/s13300-021-01097-9.


Comparison of the injection-site experience of the starting doses with semaglutide and dulaglutide: A randomized, double-blind trial in healthy subjects.

Snitker S, Andersen A, Berg B, van Marle S, Sparre T Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021; 23(6):1415-1419.

PMID: 33591618 PMC: 8251561. DOI: 10.1111/dom.14349.


References
1.
Molife C, Lee L, Shi L, Sawhney M, Lenox S . Assessment of patient-reported outcomes of insulin pen devices versus conventional vial and syringe. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009; 11(8):529-38. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2009.0007. View

2.
Peyrot M, Rubin R, Kruger D, Travis L . Correlates of insulin injection omission. Diabetes Care. 2010; 33(2):240-5. PMC: 2809256. DOI: 10.2337/dc09-1348. View

3.
Rubin R, Peyrot M . Quality of life, treatment satisfaction, and treatment preference associated with use of a pen device delivering a premixed 70/30 insulin aspart suspension (aspart protamine suspension/soluble aspart) versus alternative treatment strategies. Diabetes Care. 2004; 27(10):2495-7. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.27.10.2495. View

4.
DArcy C, Thomas D, Stoneman D, Parkes L . Patient assessment of an electronic device for subcutaneous self-injection of interferon β-1a for multiple sclerosis: an observational study in the UK and Ireland. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2012; 6:55-61. PMC: 3269318. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S26250. View

5.
Davis E, Bebee A, Crawford L, Destache C . Nurse satisfaction using insulin pens in hospitalized patients. Diabetes Educ. 2009; 35(5):799-809. DOI: 10.1177/0145721709340057. View