» Articles » PMID: 25900085

Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping at 3 T and 1.5 T: Evaluation of Consistency and Reproducibility

Overview
Journal Invest Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2015 Apr 23
PMID 25900085
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the consistency and reproducibility of quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) at 3-T and 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR) scanners.

Materials And Methods: This study was approved by institutional ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained. Twenty-two healthy volunteers underwent 2 examinations on different days. Each examination consisted of MR imaging on both 3-T and 1.5-T MR scanners. The data from both scanners and examination days were obtained, and QSM was calculated with STI Suite using 2 different algorithms--harmonic phase removal using laplacian operator (HARPERELLA) and a sophisticated harmonic artifact reduction for phase data (SHARP) method with a variable radius of the spherical kernel at the brain boundary (V-SHARP). We evaluated consistency of QSM between 3 T and 1.5 T and the reproducibility between the first and second examinations using 2-phase processing methods (HARPERELLA and V-SHARP).

Results: Susceptibility values of regions of interests at 3 T were highly correlated with those at 1.5 T with good agreement (HARPERELLA, R2 = 0.838; V-SHARP, R2 = 0.898) (average difference, ±1.96 SD; HARPERELLA, -0.012 ± 0.046; V-SHARP, -0.002 ± 0.034). Reproducibility analysis demonstrated excellent correlation between the first and second examination at both 3 T and 1.5 T for both algorithms (HARPERELLA at 3 T, R2 = 0.921; 1.5 T, R2 = 0.891; V-SHARP at 3 T, R2 = 0.937; 1.5 T, R2 = 0.926). Bland-Altman analysis showed excellent reproducibility for HARPERELLA (3 T, -0.003 ± 0.032; 1.5 T, -0.003 ± 0.038) and V-SHARP (3 T, -0.003 ± 0.027; 1.5 T, -0.003 ± 0.029). Susceptibility values of these 2 algorithms were highly correlated with good agreement (3T, R2 = 0.961; 1.5 T, R = 0.931) (3 T, 0.009 ± 0.023; 1.5 T, -0.003 ± 0.049).

Conclusions: Quantitative susceptibility mapping with HARPERELLA and V-SHARP demonstrated good reproducibility at 3 T and 1.5 T, and QSM with V-SHARP demonstrated good consistency at 3 T and 1.5 T.

Citing Articles

Advancing clinical MRI exams with artificial intelligence: Japan's contributions and future prospects.

Fujita S, Fushimi Y, Ito R, Matsui Y, Tatsugami F, Fujioka T Jpn J Radiol. 2024; 43(3):355-364.

PMID: 39548049 PMC: 11868336. DOI: 10.1007/s11604-024-01689-y.


Interscanner reproducibility of volumetric quantitative susceptibility mapping about cerebral subcortical gray nuclei at different MR vendors with the same magnetic strength.

Liu M, Zhao S, Chen Z Brain Behav. 2024; 14(4):e3473.

PMID: 38594225 PMC: 11004039. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.3473.


Feasibility and intra-and interobserver reproducibility of quantitative susceptibility mapping with radiomic features for intracranial dissecting intramural hematomas and atherosclerotic calcifications.

Park S, Kim D, Jung S, Nam Y, Alabdulwahhab A, Lee J Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):3651.

PMID: 36871117 PMC: 9985647. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-30745-2.


Regional age-related changes of neuromelanin and iron in the substantia nigra based on neuromelanin accumulation and iron deposition.

Chen Y, Gong T, Sun C, Yang A, Gao F, Chen T Eur Radiol. 2023; 33(5):3704-3714.

PMID: 36680605 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09411-8.


Visualizing the deep cerebellar nuclei using quantitative susceptibility mapping: An application in healthy controls, Parkinson's disease patients and essential tremor patients.

Zhang Y, Huang P, Wang X, Xu Q, Liu Y, Jin Z Hum Brain Mapp. 2022; 44(4):1810-1824.

PMID: 36502376 PMC: 9921226. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26178.