Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping at 3 T and 1.5 T: Evaluation of Consistency and Reproducibility
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the consistency and reproducibility of quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) at 3-T and 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR) scanners.
Materials And Methods: This study was approved by institutional ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained. Twenty-two healthy volunteers underwent 2 examinations on different days. Each examination consisted of MR imaging on both 3-T and 1.5-T MR scanners. The data from both scanners and examination days were obtained, and QSM was calculated with STI Suite using 2 different algorithms--harmonic phase removal using laplacian operator (HARPERELLA) and a sophisticated harmonic artifact reduction for phase data (SHARP) method with a variable radius of the spherical kernel at the brain boundary (V-SHARP). We evaluated consistency of QSM between 3 T and 1.5 T and the reproducibility between the first and second examinations using 2-phase processing methods (HARPERELLA and V-SHARP).
Results: Susceptibility values of regions of interests at 3 T were highly correlated with those at 1.5 T with good agreement (HARPERELLA, R2 = 0.838; V-SHARP, R2 = 0.898) (average difference, ±1.96 SD; HARPERELLA, -0.012 ± 0.046; V-SHARP, -0.002 ± 0.034). Reproducibility analysis demonstrated excellent correlation between the first and second examination at both 3 T and 1.5 T for both algorithms (HARPERELLA at 3 T, R2 = 0.921; 1.5 T, R2 = 0.891; V-SHARP at 3 T, R2 = 0.937; 1.5 T, R2 = 0.926). Bland-Altman analysis showed excellent reproducibility for HARPERELLA (3 T, -0.003 ± 0.032; 1.5 T, -0.003 ± 0.038) and V-SHARP (3 T, -0.003 ± 0.027; 1.5 T, -0.003 ± 0.029). Susceptibility values of these 2 algorithms were highly correlated with good agreement (3T, R2 = 0.961; 1.5 T, R = 0.931) (3 T, 0.009 ± 0.023; 1.5 T, -0.003 ± 0.049).
Conclusions: Quantitative susceptibility mapping with HARPERELLA and V-SHARP demonstrated good reproducibility at 3 T and 1.5 T, and QSM with V-SHARP demonstrated good consistency at 3 T and 1.5 T.
Fujita S, Fushimi Y, Ito R, Matsui Y, Tatsugami F, Fujioka T Jpn J Radiol. 2024; 43(3):355-364.
PMID: 39548049 PMC: 11868336. DOI: 10.1007/s11604-024-01689-y.
Liu M, Zhao S, Chen Z Brain Behav. 2024; 14(4):e3473.
PMID: 38594225 PMC: 11004039. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.3473.
Park S, Kim D, Jung S, Nam Y, Alabdulwahhab A, Lee J Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):3651.
PMID: 36871117 PMC: 9985647. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-30745-2.
Chen Y, Gong T, Sun C, Yang A, Gao F, Chen T Eur Radiol. 2023; 33(5):3704-3714.
PMID: 36680605 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09411-8.
Zhang Y, Huang P, Wang X, Xu Q, Liu Y, Jin Z Hum Brain Mapp. 2022; 44(4):1810-1824.
PMID: 36502376 PMC: 9921226. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26178.