» Articles » PMID: 25889602

Decision Coaching Using the Ottawa Family Decision Guide with Parents and Their Children: a Field Testing Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2015 Apr 19
PMID 25889602
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Although children can benefit from being included in health decisions, little is known about effective interventions to support their involvement. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of decision coaching guided by the Ottawa Family Decision Guide with children and parents considering insulin delivery options for type 1 diabetes (insulin pump, multiple daily injections, or standard insulin injections).

Methods: Pre-/post-test field testing design. Eligible participants were children (≤18 years) with type 1 diabetes and their parents attending an ambulatory diabetes clinic in a tertiary children's hospital. Parent-child dyads received decision coaching using the Ottawa Family Decision Guide that was pre-populated with evidence on insulin delivery options, benefits, and harms. Primary outcomes were feasibility of recruitment and data collection, and parent and child acceptability of the intervention.

Results: Of 16 families invited to participate, 12 agreed and 7 attended the decision coaching session. For the five missed families, two families were unable to attend the session or the decision coach was not available (N=3). Baseline and immediately post-coaching questionnaires were all completed and follow-up questionnaires two weeks post-coaching were missing from one parent-child dyad. Missing questionnaire items were 5 of 340 items for children (1.5%) and 1 of 429 for parents (0.2%). Decision coaching was rated as acceptable with higher scores from parents and their children who were in earlier stages of decision making.

Conclusion: Decision coaching with children and their parents considering insulin options was feasible implement and evaluate in our diabetes clinic and was acceptable to participants. Recruitment was difficult due to scheduling restrictions related to the timing of the study. Coaching should target participants earlier in the decision making process and be scheduled at times that are convenient for families and coaches. Findings were used to inform a full-scale evaluation that is currently underway.

Citing Articles

Family-centred care interventions for children with chronic conditions: A scoping review.

Chow A, Saad A, Al-Baldawi Z, Iverson R, Skidmore B, Jordan I Health Expect. 2024; 27(1):e13897.

PMID: 39102737 PMC: 10837485. DOI: 10.1111/hex.13897.


Co-creating a suite of patient decision aids for parents of an infant or young child with differences of sex development: A methods roadmap.

Lightfoot S, Carley M, Brinkman W, Gardner M, Gruppen L, Liang N Front Urol. 2023; 2.

PMID: 37885597 PMC: 10601605. DOI: 10.3389/fruro.2022.1020152.


Understanding how and under what circumstances decision coaching works for people making healthcare decisions: a realist review.

Zhao J, Jull J, Finderup J, Smith M, Kienlin S, Rahn A BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022; 22(1):265.

PMID: 36209086 PMC: 9548102. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-022-02007-0.


Adaptation of a Shared Decision-Making Tool for Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment Decisions with Indigenous Patients.

Umaefulam V, Fox T, Hazlewood G, Bansback N, Barber C, Barnabe C Patient. 2021; 15(2):233-243.

PMID: 34486098 PMC: 8866334. DOI: 10.1007/s40271-021-00546-8.


An Early Palliative Care Telehealth Coaching Intervention to Enhance Advanced Cancer Family Caregivers' Decision Support Skills: The CASCADE Pilot Factorial Trial.

Dionne-Odom J, Wells R, Guastaferro K, Azuero A, Hendricks B, Currie E J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021; 63(1):11-22.

PMID: 34343621 PMC: 8881798. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.07.023.


References
1.
Watson-Thompson J, Fawcett S, Schultz J . A framework for community mobilization to promote healthy youth development. Am J Prev Med. 2008; 34(3 Suppl):S72-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.12.016. View

2.
Gabe J, Olumide G, Bury M . 'It takes three to tango': a framework for understanding patient partnership in paediatric clinics. Soc Sci Med. 2004; 59(5):1071-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.09.035. View

3.
Tercyak K, Johnson S, Roberts S, Cruz A . Psychological response to prenatal genetic counseling and amniocentesis. Patient Educ Couns. 2001; 43(1):73-84. DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(00)00146-4. View

4.
Stacey D, Kryworuchko J, Bennett C, Murray M, Mullan S, Legare F . Decision coaching to prepare patients for making health decisions: a systematic review of decision coaching in trials of patient decision AIDS. Med Decis Making. 2012; 32(3):E22-33. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X12443311. View

5.
Olsen B, Lilleore S, Korsholm C, Kracht T . Novopen Echo® for the delivery of insulin: a comparison of usability, functionality and preference among pediatric subjects, their parents, and health care professionals. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010; 4(6):1468-75. PMC: 3005058. DOI: 10.1177/193229681000400622. View