» Articles » PMID: 25888898

Implementing a Care Pathway for Elderly Patients, a Comparative Qualitative Process Evaluation in Primary Care

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2015 Apr 19
PMID 25888898
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In Central Norway a generic care pathway was developed in collaboration between general hospitals and primary care with the intention of implementing it into everyday practice. The care pathway targeted elderly patients who were in need of home care services after discharge from hospital. The aim of the present study was to investigate the implementation process of the care pathway by comparing the experiences of health care professionals and managers in home care services between the participating municipalities.

Methods: This was a qualitative comparative process evaluation using data from individual and focus group interviews. The Normalization Process Theory, which provides a framework for understanding how a new intervention becomes part of normal practice, was applied in our analysis.

Results: In all of the municipalities there were expectations that the generic care pathway would improve care coordination and quality of follow-up, but a substantial amount of work was needed to make the regular home care staff understand how to use the care pathway. Other factors of importance for successful implementation were involvement of the executive municipal management, strong managerial focus on creating engagement and commitment among all professional groups, practical facilitation of work processes, and a stable organisation without major competing priorities. At the end of the project period, the pathway was integrated in daily practice in two of the six municipalities. In these municipalities the care pathway was found to have the potential of structuring the provision of home care services and collaboration with the GPs, and serving as a management tool to effect change and improve knowledge and skills.

Conclusion: The generic care pathway for elderly patients has a potential of improving follow-up in primary care by meeting professional and managerial needs for improved quality of care, as well as more efficient organisation of home care services. However, implementation of this complex intervention in full-time running organisations was demanding and required comprehensive and prolonged efforts in all levels of the organisation. Studies on implementation of such complex interventions should therefore have a long follow-up time to identify whether the intervention becomes integrated into everyday practice.

Citing Articles

Healthcare professionals' views on implementing the STAR care pathway for people with chronic pain after total knee replacement: A qualitative study.

Moore A, Wylde V, Bertram W, Beswick A, Howells N, Gooberman-Hill R PLoS One. 2023; 18(4):e0284406.

PMID: 37115771 PMC: 10146502. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284406.


Experiences of using clinical pathways in hospitals: Perspectives of quality improvement personnel.

Hwang J, Tchoe H, Chung S, Park E, Choi M Nurs Open. 2022; 10(1):337-348.

PMID: 35986469 PMC: 9748067. DOI: 10.1002/nop2.1309.


Dilemmas and deliberations in managing the care trajectory of elderly patients with complex health needs: a single-case study.

Kumlin M, Berg G, Kvigne K, Helleso R BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 22(1):1030.

PMID: 35962337 PMC: 9375356. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08422-3.


Outcomes of complex discharge planning in older adults with complex needs: a scoping review.

Rameli P, Rajendran N J Int Med Res. 2022; 50(7):3000605221110511.

PMID: 35903858 PMC: 9340947. DOI: 10.1177/03000605221110511.


Specificity of severe AKI aetiology and care in the elderly. The IRACIBLE prospective cohort study.

Cardinale A, Messikh Z, Antoine V, Aglae C, Reboul P, Cariou S J Nephrol. 2022; 35(8):2097-2108.

PMID: 35503200 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-022-01322-z.


References
1.
Murray E, Treweek S, Pope C, MacFarlane A, Ballini L, Dowrick C . Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions. BMC Med. 2010; 8:63. PMC: 2978112. DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-63. View

2.
Jolly K, Bradley F, Sharp S, Smith H, Mant D . Follow-up care in general practice of patients with myocardial infarction or angina pectoris: initial results of the SHIP trial. Southampton Heart Integrated Care Project. Fam Pract. 1999; 15(6):548-55. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/15.6.548. View

3.
Garasen H, Windspoll R, Johnsen R . Intermediate care at a community hospital as an alternative to prolonged general hospital care for elderly patients: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2007; 7:68. PMC: 1868721. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-68. View

4.
Malterud K . Systematic text condensation: a strategy for qualitative analysis. Scand J Public Health. 2012; 40(8):795-805. DOI: 10.1177/1403494812465030. View

5.
Smith S, Soubhi H, Fortin M, Hudon C, ODowd T . Managing patients with multimorbidity: systematic review of interventions in primary care and community settings. BMJ. 2012; 345:e5205. PMC: 3432635. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e5205. View