» Articles » PMID: 25888208

High Resolution MRI Imaging at 9.4 Tesla of the Osteochondral Unit in a Translational Model of Articular Cartilage Repair

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology
Date 2015 Apr 19
PMID 25888208
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Non-destructive structural evaluation of the osteochondral unit is challenging. Here, the capability of high-field magnetic resonance imaging (μMRI) at 9.4 Tesla (T) was explored to examine osteochondral repair ex vivo in a preclinical large animal model. A specific aim of this study was to detect recently described alterations of the subchondral bone associated with cartilage repair.

Methods: Osteochondral samples of medial femoral condyles from adult ewes containing full-thickness articular cartilage defects treated with marrow stimulation were obtained after 6 month in vivo and scanned in a 9.4 T μMRI. Ex vivo imaging of small osteochondral samples (typical volume: 1-2 cm(3)) at μMRI was optimised by variation of repetition time (TR), time echo (TE), flip angle (FA), spatial resolution and number of excitations (NEX) from standard MultiSliceMultiEcho (MSME) and three-dimensional (3D) spoiled GradientEcho (SGE) sequences.

Results: A 3D SGE sequence with the parameters: TR = 10 ms, TE = 3 ms, FA = 10°, voxel size = 120 × 120 × 120 μm(3) and NEX = 10 resulted in the best fitting for sample size, image quality, scanning time and artifacts. An isovolumetric voxel shape allowed for multiplanar reconstructions. Within the osteochondral unit articular cartilage, cartilaginous repair tissue and bone marrow could clearly be distinguished from the subchondral bone plate and subarticular spongiosa. Specific alterations of the osteochondral unit associated with cartilage repair such as persistent drill holes, subchondral bone cysts, sclerosis of the subchondral bone plate and of the subarticular spongiosa and intralesional osteophytes were precisely detected.

Conclusions: High resolution, non-destructive ex vivo analysis of the entire osteochondral unit in a preclinical large animal model that is sufficient for further analyses is possible using μMRI at 9.4 T. In particular, 9.4 T is capable of accurately depicting alterations of the subchondral bone that are associated with osteochondral repair.

Citing Articles

Recent advances in 3D bioprinting of musculoskeletal tissues.

Potyondy T, Uquillas J, Tebon P, Byambaa B, Hasan A, Tavafoghi M Biofabrication. 2020; 13(2).

PMID: 33166949 PMC: 8312688. DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/abc8de.


Is Laminar Cartilage Composition as Determined by T2 Relaxometry Associated with Incident and Worsening of Cartilage or Bone Marrow Abnormalities?.

Roemer F, Eckstein F, Duda G, Guermazi A, Maschek S, Sharma L Cartilage. 2020; 13(1_suppl):757S-766S.

PMID: 32527154 PMC: 8808850. DOI: 10.1177/1947603520932197.


Subchondral drilling for articular cartilage repair: a systematic review of translational research.

Gao L, Goebel L, Orth P, Cucchiarini M, Madry H Dis Model Mech. 2018; 11(6).

PMID: 29728409 PMC: 6031351. DOI: 10.1242/dmm.034280.


Stem Cells for Cartilage Repair: Preclinical Studies and Insights in Translational Animal Models and Outcome Measures.

Lo Monaco M, Merckx G, Ratajczak J, Gervois P, Hilkens P, Clegg P Stem Cells Int. 2018; 2018:9079538.

PMID: 29535784 PMC: 5832141. DOI: 10.1155/2018/9079538.

References
1.
Orth P, Cucchiarini M, Kohn D, Madry H . Alterations of the subchondral bone in osteochondral repair--translational data and clinical evidence. Eur Cell Mater. 2013; 25:299-316. DOI: 10.22203/ecm.v025a21. View

2.
Madry H, van Dijk C, Mueller-Gerbl M . The basic science of the subchondral bone. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010; 18(4):419-33. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-010-1054-z. View

3.
Roemer F, Frobell R, Hunter D, Crema M, Fischer W, Bohndorf K . MRI-detected subchondral bone marrow signal alterations of the knee joint: terminology, imaging appearance, relevance and radiological differential diagnosis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009; 17(9):1115-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2009.03.012. View

4.
Zscharnack M, Hepp P, Richter R, Aigner T, Schulz R, Somerson J . Repair of chronic osteochondral defects using predifferentiated mesenchymal stem cells in an ovine model. Am J Sports Med. 2010; 38(9):1857-69. DOI: 10.1177/0363546510365296. View

5.
Eldracher M, Orth P, Cucchiarini M, Pape D, Madry H . Small subchondral drill holes improve marrow stimulation of articular cartilage defects. Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42(11):2741-50. DOI: 10.1177/0363546514547029. View