» Articles » PMID: 25885988

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Ropivacaine with Bupivacaine for Intrathecal Anesthesia for Lower Abdominal and Lower Limb Surgeries

Overview
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 2015 Apr 18
PMID 25885988
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A prospective randomized clinical study was conducted to study the efficacy and safety of ropivacaine with bupivacaine intrathecally for lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries.

Material And Methods: 70 patients aged between 18 to 65 years were randomized into two groups, n = 35 in each group. Group A received 3 ml of (0.5%) isobaric bupivacaine (15 mg) and Group B 3 ml of (0.75%) isobaric ropivacaine (22.5 mg). Spinal anesthesia procedure was standardized. Haemodynamic parameters, onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade, level achieved, regression and side effects were compared between the two groups.

Results: Onset and regression of sensory blockade in ropivacaine group was faster with a P < 0.001 which was statistically significant. Onset of motor blockade was rapid in both the groups but duration of motor blockade was significantly shorter in ropivacaine group. Excellent analgesia, with no side effects and stable haemodynamics was noted in ropivacaine group.

Conclusion: Hence ropivacaine was safe and equally effective as bupivacaine for lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries with early motor recovery, providing early ambulation.

Citing Articles

Role of Dexmedetomidine and Clonidine With Hyperbaric Ropivacaine in Subarachnoid Block: A Comprehensive Review.

Sharma R, Bhutda S, Bhutda S, Munjewar P, Sharma R Cureus. 2024; 16(7):e65798.

PMID: 39219892 PMC: 11362557. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.65798.


Intrathecal ropivacaine versus bupivacaine in a non-obstetric population- A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Khalil R, Mehmud A, Banerjee R, Malhotra R, Banerjee A Indian J Anaesth. 2024; 68(2):129-141.

PMID: 38435645 PMC: 10903766. DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_715_23.


Sympathetic nerve blocks for posttraumatic stress disorder: an evidentiary review for future clinical trials.

Prasad S, Jain N, Umar T, Radenkov I, Ahmed S, Sakagianni V Front Psychiatry. 2024; 14:1309986.

PMID: 38188052 PMC: 10771322. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1309986.


A Comparative Study on the Effect of Intrathecal Bupivacaine vs. Ropivacaine on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes After Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Jaafarpour M, Vasigh A, Najafi F, Sayadi H, Shafiei E Anesth Pain Med. 2023; 13(3):e134732.

PMID: 38021336 PMC: 10664161. DOI: 10.5812/aapm-134732.


Isobaric forms of ropivacaine . bupivacaine in lower abdominal surgeries: a hospital-based, prospective, comparative study.

Patil P, Dhulkhed P, Dhulkhed V Med Gas Res. 2022; 13(3):123-127.

PMID: 36571377 PMC: 9979211. DOI: 10.4103/2045-9912.359678.


References
1.
Ruetsch Y, Boni T, Borgeat A . From cocaine to ropivacaine: the history of local anesthetic drugs. Curr Top Med Chem. 2002; 1(3):175-82. DOI: 10.2174/1568026013395335. View

2.
Greene N . Distribution of local anesthetic solutions within the subarachnoid space. Anesth Analg. 1985; 64(7):715-30. View

3.
McNamee D, McClelland A, Scott S, Milligan K, Westman L, Gustafsson U . Spinal anaesthesia: comparison of plain ropivacaine 5 mg ml(-1) with bupivacaine 5 mg ml(-1) for major orthopaedic surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2002; 89(5):702-6. View

4.
Kallio H, Snall E, Kero M, Rosenberg P . A comparison of intrathecal plain solutions containing ropivacaine 20 or 15 mg versus bupivacaine 10 mg. Anesth Analg. 2004; 99(3):713-717. DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000129976.26455.32. View

5.
Hodgson P, Neal J, Pollock J, Liu S . The neurotoxicity of drugs given intrathecally (spinal). Anesth Analg. 1999; 88(4):797-809. DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199904000-00023. View